Cited by 77Urban and Freight Transport Logisticstransportation and logistics systemsTransport and Economic Policies

A behavioral analysis of freight mode choice decisions

Samimi, Amir, Kawamura, Kazuya, Mohammadian, Abolfazl·2011·Transportation Planning and Technology

Abstract

This paper develops a behavioral analysis of freight mode choice decisions that could provide a basis for an acceptable analytical tool for policy assessment. The paper specifically examines the way that truck and rail compete for commodity movement in the US. Two binary mode choice models are introduced in which some shipment-specific variables (e.g. distance, weight and value) and mode-specific variables (e.g. haul time and cost) are found to be determinants. The specifications of the non-selected choice are imputed in a machine learning module. Shipping cost is found to be a central factor for rail shipments, while road shipments are found to be more sensitive to haul time. Sensitivity of mode choice decisions is further analyzed under different fuel price fluctuation scenarios. A low level of mode choice sensitivity is found with respect to fuel price, such that even a 50% increase in fuel cost does not cause a significant modal shift between truck and rail.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03081060.2011.600092

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In freight, ML has been applied to analyze modal trade-offs, for example by imputing data on counterfactual mode choices.

    “Also in the freight sector, ML has been applied to analyze modal trade-offs, for example, by imputing data on counterfactual mode choices [706].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [706]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Samimi, A., Kawamura, K., & Mohammadian, A.
Affiliations
  • Sharif University of Technology (IR)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Samimi, Amir
Venue
Transportation Planning and Technology
Published
2011-12
Volume
34
Issue
8
Pages
857-869
ISSN
  • 0308-1060 (ISSN-L)
  • 1029-0354
OpenAlex
W2047489154
Cited by
77
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Transportation Planning and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Transportation
  • Illinois Department of Transportation
  • University of Illinois at Chicago
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban and Freight Transport Logistics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › transportation and logistics systems
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Transport and Economic Policies
Keywords
freight mode choice, truck transportation, railways, modal shift, binary choice models, shipping costs, fuel price sensitivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review