Life beyond big data–governing with little analytics
Open accessAbstract
The twenty-first-century rise of big data marks a significant break with statistical notions of what is of interest or concern. The vast expansion of digital data has been closely intertwined with the development of advanced analytical algorithms with which to make sense of the data. The advent of techniques of knowledge discovery affords some capacity for the analytics to derive the object or subject of interest from clusters and patterns in large volumes of data, otherwise imperceptible to human reading. Thus, the scale of the big in big data is of less significance to contemporary forms of knowing and governing than what we will call the little analytics. Following Henri Bergson's analysis of forms of perception which ‘cut out’ a series of figures detached from the whole, we propose that analytical algorithms are instruments of perception without which the extensity of big data would not be comprehensible. The technologies of analytics focus human attention and decision on particular persons and things of interest, whilst annulling or discarding much of the material context from which they are extracted. Following the algorithmic processes of ingestion, partitioning and memory, we illuminate how the use of analytics engines has transformed the nature of analysis and knowledge and, thus, the nature of the governing of economic, social and political life.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Evaluative infrastructures work because they do something other than verify and validate the world as it is; they disclose the world that digital traces and extensive data mining provide.
“Evaluative infrastructures work because they do something other than verify and validate the world as it is.Rather, they disclose the world that the digital traces and extensive data mining provide: a process of what Amoore and Piotulh (2015) describe as “little analytics” in which correlations and relations are found that have very little meaning a priori.”
From Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization (2017) · cites this paper as Amoore and Piotulh, 2015
Cites
Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1990) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085149000000001 · Cited by 2,877 · see citing works
Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life
Nissenbaum, H. (2009) · doi:10.1515/9780804772891 · Cited by 2,129 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For the work of the analytics is not at all challenged by the demand that the context of data be respected in its analysis (Nissenbaum, 2010), nor that one has the right to be forgotten or deleted in a digital age (Mayer-Schönberger, 2009).”
BackgroundThe Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures & Their Consequences
Kitchin, R. (2014) · doi:10.4135/9781473909472 · Cited by 1,469 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Of course, we might say that all data declared to be unstructured is always already structured, and certainly remains structured in important ways within data architectures and digital devices (Berry, 2014; Kitchin, 2014).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization
Kornberger, M., Pflueger, D., & Mouritsen, J. (2017) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2017.05.002 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Speculative futures: Cities, data, and governance beyond smart urbanism
Leszczynski, A. (2016) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1177/0308518x16651445 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Big Data and algorithmic governance: The case of financial practices
Campbell-Verduyn, M., Goguen, M., & Porter, T. (2017) · New Political Economy · doi:10.1080/13563467.2016.1216533 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Mass personalization: Predictive marketing algorithms and the reshaping of consumer knowledge
Kotras, B. (2020) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951720951581 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Algorithmic memory and the right to be forgotten on the web
Esposito, E. (2017) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951717703996 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Personalization and probabilities: Impersonal propensities in online grocery shopping
Mackenzie, A. (2018) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951718778310 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
- Authors
- Amoore, L., & Piotukh, V.
- Affiliations
- Durham University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Amoore, Louise
- Piotukh, Volha
- ORCID
- Amoore, Louise
- Venue
- Economy and Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-07-03
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 341-366
- ISSN
- 0308-5147 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5766
- OpenAlex
- W2152168320
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 34.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Economy and Society (publishedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- RCUK Global Uncertainties Fellowship Securing against Future Events: Pre-emption, Protocols and Publics (ES/K000276/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Big Data Technologies and Applications
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
- Keywords
- big data, governance, analytical algorithm, knowledge discovery, Henri Bergson, perception, data-driven decision making, knowledge production, digital data, political economy of data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review