Cited by 187Big Data Technologies and ApplicationsEthics and Social Impacts of AICybernetics and Technology in Society

Life beyond big data–governing with little analytics

Open access
Amoore, Louise, Piotukh, Volha·2015·Economy and Society

Abstract

The twenty-first-century rise of big data marks a significant break with statistical notions of what is of interest or concern. The vast expansion of digital data has been closely intertwined with the development of advanced analytical algorithms with which to make sense of the data. The advent of techniques of knowledge discovery affords some capacity for the analytics to derive the object or subject of interest from clusters and patterns in large volumes of data, otherwise imperceptible to human reading. Thus, the scale of the big in big data is of less significance to contemporary forms of knowing and governing than what we will call the little analytics. Following Henri Bergson's analysis of forms of perception which ‘cut out’ a series of figures detached from the whole, we propose that analytical algorithms are instruments of perception without which the extensity of big data would not be comprehensible. The technologies of analytics focus human attention and decision on particular persons and things of interest, whilst annulling or discarding much of the material context from which they are extracted. Following the algorithmic processes of ingestion, partitioning and memory, we illuminate how the use of analytics engines has transformed the nature of analysis and knowledge and, thus, the nature of the governing of economic, social and political life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03085147.2015.1043793

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evaluative infrastructures work because they do something other than verify and validate the world as it is; they disclose the world that digital traces and extensive data mining provide.

    “Evaluative infrastructures work because they do something other than verify and validate the world as it is.Rather, they disclose the world that the digital traces and extensive data mining provide: a process of what Amoore and Piotulh (2015) describe as “little analytics” in which correlations and relations are found that have very little meaning a priori.”

    From Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization (2017) · cites this paper as Amoore and Piotulh, 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amoore, L., & Piotukh, V.
Affiliations
Durham University (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Amoore, Louise
  • Piotukh, Volha
Venue
Economy and Society
Published
2015-07-03
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
341-366
ISSN
  • 0308-5147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5766
OpenAlex
W2152168320
Cited by
187
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 1
FWCI
34.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Economy and Society (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
RCUK Global Uncertainties Fellowship Securing against Future Events: Pre-emption, Protocols and Publics (ES/K000276/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Big Data Technologies and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
Keywords
big data, governance, analytical algorithm, knowledge discovery, Henri Bergson, perception, data-driven decision making, knowledge production, digital data, political economy of data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review