Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 469

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A sverdrup model of the depth-integrated flow for the world ocean allowing for island circulations

Godfrey, J. S.·1989·Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics

Abstract

The annual mean depth-integrated steric height P and stream function ψ of the world ocean are calculated from a Sverdrup model with Hellerman and Rosenstein's (1983) annual mean wifids. The parameterization of friction is unspecified, but friction is assumed to be important only along western boundaries. A simple rule, based on Sverdrup interior flow and geostrophy of longshore flow along western boundary currents, is used to calculate P at the inshore edge of the western boundary current. The substantial predicted longshore gradients of P drive the model western boundary currents against friction, independent of frictional parameterization. One corollary is an “Island Rule”–an explicit expression for circulation around an island, in terms of wind stress, again independent of frictional parameterization. The circulations around Australasia, New Zealand and Malagasy are calculated as 16±4 Sv, 29±v, and 4±3 Sverdrups respectively. Inclusion of island effects result in more accurate flow estimates in the Southern Hemisphere than have previously been obtained from Sverdrup models. The calculated world field of P is compared with observed depth-integrated steric height, relative to various depths of no motion, obtained from the Levitus world data set; the tropics of all oceans and the Antarctic Circumpolar Current are quite well described, but in the model an unrealistic pair of zonal jets crosses the Atlantic just south of South Africa, and the model fails in the subpolar gyres of the Northwest Atlantic and Pacific. The observed difference in annual mean P from Western Australia to Indonesia suggests a Pacific-Indian Ocean throughflow of about 12 Sverdrups. Observed values of P near each of seven oceanic eastern boundaries lie close to a single, characteristic value for that boundary; the model predicts differences between these characteristic values quite well. This may, for example, explain Reid's (1961) observations of quite large density differences between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. The model calculations are repeated with the Indonesian passages closed. In the model, the Indian Ocean becomes very much “colder”; the predicted drop in P could be created by a uniform drop of temperature of 6°C in the top 500m over the entire South Indian Ocean, with smaller changes elsewhere. More generally, there may be important implications for world climate in previous geological eras, when the distribution of continents was different from today.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03091928908208894

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 469

Metadata

Authors
Godfrey, J. S.
Venue
Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics
Published
1989-02
Volume
45
Issue
1-2
Pages
89-112
ISSN
  • 0309-1929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1029-0419
OpenAlex
W2053773428
Cited by
469
References
1
FWCI
5.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A sverdrup model of the depth-integrated flow for the world ocean allowing for island circulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03091928908208894
The paper
Godfrey, J. S. (1989). A sverdrup model of the depth-integrated flow for the world ocean allowing for island circulations. Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1080/03091928908208894

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.