Cited by 67Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social SciencesEnvironmental and sustainability educationSustainability in Higher Education

A futuring approach to teaching wicked problems

Open access
Hoffman, Jesse, Pelzer, Peter, Albert, Loes, Béneker, Tine, Hajer, Maarten, Mangnus, Astrid·2021·Journal of Geography in Higher Education

Abstract

This paper investigates how the teaching and learning about “wicked” environmental problems may be fostered through an educational approach premised on futuring – the active imagination of the future. The growing academic interest in possible and desirable futures provides a promising starting point for restructuring education as coupling knowledge to imagination and teaching to policy practice can open up new, experiential ways of learning. Empirically, this paper draws upon research on an experimental futuring course employing a “mixed classroom” formula in which students and policy-makers learn together about sustainability challenges. Drawing on the notion of inquiry, this course is set up with the aim to foster a critical engagement with the ways futures are imagined in political debates and decision-making. Through complementary activities, the students were pushed to imagine possible futures around a central theme, the transition to a circular economy, in interaction with the policy-makers and other practitioners. This culminated in a “Museum of the Future”. From our action-research-based investigation of the learning experiences in the course, we conclude that a futuring approach to teaching wicked problems results in a more active attitude of students towards the space in which wicked problems and solutions are collectively imagined and deliberated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03098265.2020.1869923

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Author one shared research reflections with the participants and invited them to review drafts and comment on the extent to which their experiences were shared in a fair and comprehensive way.

    “Finally, inspired by the approach of Hoffman et al. (2021) and consistent with a previous phase of this research (Rushton, 2021), Author one shared research reflections with the participants and invited them to review drafts and comment on the extent to which their experiences were shared in a fair and comprehensive way.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoffman, J., Pelzer, P., Albert, L., Béneker, T., Hajer, M., & Mangnus, A.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Hoffman, Jesse
Venue
Journal of Geography in Higher Education
Published
2021-01-11
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
576-593
ISSN
  • 0309-8265 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-1845
OpenAlex
W3118925946
Cited by
67
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4
FWCI
17.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Geography in Higher Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and sustainability education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Sustainability in Higher Education
Keywords
futuring, wicked problems, environmental education, possible futures, mixed classrooms, circular economy transition, sustainability challenges, Museum of the Future, experiential learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review