A futuring approach to teaching wicked problems
Open accessAbstract
This paper investigates how the teaching and learning about “wicked” environmental problems may be fostered through an educational approach premised on futuring – the active imagination of the future. The growing academic interest in possible and desirable futures provides a promising starting point for restructuring education as coupling knowledge to imagination and teaching to policy practice can open up new, experiential ways of learning. Empirically, this paper draws upon research on an experimental futuring course employing a “mixed classroom” formula in which students and policy-makers learn together about sustainability challenges. Drawing on the notion of inquiry, this course is set up with the aim to foster a critical engagement with the ways futures are imagined in political debates and decision-making. Through complementary activities, the students were pushed to imagine possible futures around a central theme, the transition to a circular economy, in interaction with the policy-makers and other practitioners. This culminated in a “Museum of the Future”. From our action-research-based investigation of the learning experiences in the course, we conclude that a futuring approach to teaching wicked problems results in a more active attitude of students towards the space in which wicked problems and solutions are collectively imagined and deliberated.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Author one shared research reflections with the participants and invited them to review drafts and comment on the extent to which their experiences were shared in a fair and comprehensive way.
“Finally, inspired by the approach of Hoffman et al. (2021) and consistent with a previous phase of this research (Rushton, 2021), Author one shared research reflections with the participants and invited them to review drafts and comment on the extent to which their experiences were shared in a fair and comprehensive way.”
From Space as a lens for teacher agency: A case study of three beginning teachers in England, <scp>UK</scp> (2024) · cites this paper as Hoffman et al. (2021)
Cites
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01405730 · Cited by 16,338 · cited 4× · see citing works
“We started this paper by pointing out that the work of Rittel and Webber (1973) and the subsequent literature on wicked problems pays little attention to the role of imagination of the future.”
BackgroundInfluentialWhere Might Sand Dunes be on Mars? Engaging Students through Inquiry-based Learning in Geography
Spronken-Smith, R., Bullard, J., Ray, W., Roberts, C., & Keiffer, A. (2008) · Journal of Geography in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03098260701731520 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rushton, E. A. C. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13095321 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Rushton, E. A. C., & Bird, A. (2024) · The Curriculum Journal · doi:10.1002/curj.224 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“Finally, inspired by the approach of Hoffman et al. (2021) and consistent with a previous phase of this research (Rushton, 2021), Author one shared research reflections with the participants and invited them to review drafts and comment on the extent to which their experiences were shared in a fair…”
- Authors
- Hoffman, J., Pelzer, P., Albert, L., Béneker, T., Hajer, M., & Mangnus, A.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Hoffman, Jesse
- Venue
- Journal of Geography in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-01-11
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 576-593
- ISSN
- 0309-8265 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-1845
- OpenAlex
- W3118925946
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 17.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Geography in Higher Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and sustainability education
- Social Sciences › Education › Sustainability in Higher Education
- Keywords
- futuring, wicked problems, environmental education, possible futures, mixed classrooms, circular economy transition, sustainability challenges, Museum of the Future, experiential learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review