Cited by 112Geography Education and PedagogyScience Education and PedagogyProblem and Project Based Learning

Where Might Sand Dunes be on Mars? Engaging Students through Inquiry-based Learning in Geography

Spronken-Smith, Rachel, Bullard, JO, Ray, Waverly, Roberts, Carolyn, Keiffer, Artimus·2008·Journal of Geography in Higher Education

Abstract

This paper encourages readers to experiment with inquiry-based learning (IBL) in their courses in the interest of identifying more diverse styles of instruction, and developing a wider understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of the methodology. The aims of the paper are to unpack the meanings of IBL, describe some uses of IBL in geography, and discuss their benefits and challenges for students and teachers. IBL is essentially a question-driven, philosophical approach to teaching that involves active, student-centred learning. The teacher acts principally as a facilitator or mentor, guiding and encouraging students through the inquiry process. Examples of IBL are presented, ranging from questioning exercises embedded in the class, through to entire courses or degrees using an inquiry-based approach. Students can benefit greatly from IBL since they are active in the learning process, can have improved understanding, more enjoyable learning, develop valuable research skills, achieve higher-order learning outcomes and perform better academically. Teachers can also benefit through a strengthening of teaching–research links and the clear gains in student engagement and learning. However, in order for IBL to be effective, teachers must be encouraged and supported to take on this facilitating role. When IBL elements are embedded in a more traditional curriculum, particular care needs to be taken so that students and teachers are carefully oriented to the expectations regarding the outcome of learning and teaching in this mode.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03098260701731520

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spronken-Smith, R., Bullard, J., Ray, W., Roberts, C., & Keiffer, A.
Affiliations
  • Loughborough University (GB)
  • MiraCosta College (US)
  • University of Gloucestershire (GB)
  • Wittenberg University (US)
Venue
Journal of Geography in Higher Education
Published
2008-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
71-86
ISSN
  • 0309-8265 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-1845
OpenAlex
W2161745580
Cited by
112
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
49.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Geography in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geography Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
Keywords
inquiry-based learning, geography education, student-centered learning, active learning, student engagement, teacher as facilitator, research skills, curriculum integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review