Cited by 38Environmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyPesticide and Herbicide Environmental StudiesAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

Assessing the Toxicity of Organophosphorous Pesticides to Indigenous Algae with Implication for Their Ecotoxicological Impact to Aquatic Ecosystems

Tien, Chien-jung, Chen, Colin S.·2012·Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the toxicity of three organophosphorous pesticides, chlorpyrifos, terbufos and methamidophos, to three indigenous algal species isolated from local rivers and algal mixtures. The diatom Nitzschia sp. (0.30–1.68 mg L−1 of EC50 -the estimated concentration related to a 50% growth reduction) and the cyanobacteria Oscillatoria sp. (EC50 of 0.33–7.99 mg L−1) were sensitive to single pesticide treatment and the chlorophyta Chlorella sp. was the most tolerant (EC50 of 1.29–41.16 mg L−1). In treatment with the mixture of three pesticides, Chlorella sp. became the most sensitive alga. The antagonistic joint toxic effects on three indigenous algae and algal mixtures were found for most of the two pesticide mixtures. The results suggested that mixture of pesticides might induce the detoxification mechanisms more easily than the single pesticide. The synergistic interactions between terbufos and methamidophos to algal mixtures and between methamidophos and chlorpyrifos to Nitzschia sp. indicated methamidophos might act as a potential synergist. Differential sensitivity of three families of algae to these pesticides might result in changes in the algal community structures after river water has been contaminated with different pesticides, posing great ecological risk on the structure and functioning of the aquatic ecosystem.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03601234.2012.693870

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 38

Authors
Tien, C.-J., & Chen, C. S.
Affiliations
National Kaohsiung Normal University (TW)
Venue
Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B
Published
2012-10
Volume
47
Issue
9
Pages
901-912
ISSN
  • 0360-1234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-4109
OpenAlex
W2123873009
Cited by
38
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Illinois at Chicago
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
organophosphorus pesticides, pesticide toxicity, chlorpyrifos, terbufos, methamidophos, synergistic toxicity, antagonistic toxicity, Nitzschia, Oscillatoria, Chlorella, algal growth inhibition, aquatic ecosystem risk, river pollution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review