The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular Mechanisms of Hydrogen Sulfide Toxicity
Abstract
RATIONALE: The toxicity of H2S has been attributed to its ability to inhibit cytochrome c oxidase in a similar manner to HCN. However, the successful use of methemoglobin for the treatment of HCN poisoning was not successful for H2S poisonings even though the ferric heme group of methemoglobin scavenges H2S. Thus, we speculated that other mechanisms contribute to H2S induced cytotoxicity. Experimental procedure. Hepatocyte isolation and viability and enzyme activities were measured as described by Moldeus et al. (1978), and Steen et al. (2001). RESULTS: Incubation of isolated hepatocytes with NaHS solutions (a H2S source) resulted in glutathione (GSH) depletion. Moreover, GSH depletion was also observed in TRIS-HCl buffer (pH 6.0) treated with NaHS. Several ferric chelators (desferoxamime and DETAPAC) and antioxidant enzymes (superoxide dismutase [SOD] and catalase) prevented cell-free and hepatocyte GSH depletion. GSH-depleted hepatocytes were very susceptible to NaHS cytotoxicity, indicating that GSH detoxified NaHS or H2S in cells. Cytotoxicity was also partly prevented by desferoxamine and DETAPC, but it was increased by ferric EDTA or EDTA. Cell-free oxygen consumption experiments in TRIS-HCl buffer showed that NaHS autoxidation formed hydrogen peroxide and was prevented by DETAPC but increased by EDTA. We hypothesize that H2S can reduce intracellular bound ferric iron to form unbound ferrous iron, which activates iron. Additionally, H2S can increase the hepatocyte formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (known to occur with electron transport chain). H2S cytotoxicity therefore also involves a reactive sulfur species, which depletes GSH and activates oxygen to form ROS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dorman, D. C. (2002) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/65.1.18 · Cited by 362
Cited by
Hydrogen sulphide and its therapeutic potential
Szabó, C. (2007) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2425 · Cited by 2,038
Physiological roles of hydrogen sulfide in mammalian cells, tissues, and organs
Cirino, G., Szabo, C., & Papapetropoulos, A. (2023) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00028.2021 · Cited by 553
Szabo, C., Ransy, C., Módis, K., Andriamihaja, M., Murghes, B., Coletta, C., Olah, G., Yanagi, K., & Bouillaud, F. (2014) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bph.12369 · Cited by 440
Fukuto, J. M., Carrington, S. J., Tantillo, D. J., Harrison, J. G., Ignarro, L. J., Freeman, B. A., Chen, A., & Wink, D. A. (2012) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx2005234 · Cited by 389
Determination of glutathione and glutathione disulfide in biological samples: An in-depth review
Monostori, P., Wittmann, G., Karg, E., & Túri, S. (2009) · Journal of Chromatography B · doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.06.016 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Truong, D. H., Eghbal, M. A., Hindmarsh, W., Roth, S. H., & O'Brien, P. J.
- Venue
- Drug Metabolism Reviews
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 733-744
- ISSN
- 0360-2532 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-9883
- OpenAlex
- W2002283108
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Mechanisms of Hydrogen Sulfide Toxicity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03602530600959607
- The paper
- Truong, D. H., Eghbal, M. A., Hindmarsh, W., Roth, S. H., & O'Brien, P. J. (2006). Molecular Mechanisms of Hydrogen Sulfide Toxicity. Drug Metabolism Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602530600959607
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.