Cited by 5

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Removal Potential of Basic Dyes and Lead from Water by Brewer's Yeast Biomass

Lin, Han-Hui, Stephen Inbaraj, B., Kao, Tsai-Hua·2019·Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists

Abstract

The brewing by-product brewer’s yeast biomass (BYB) was evaluated as a bioadsorbent for removal of basic dyes and lead from aqueous solutions. The functional groups including the hydroxyl group and cyano group are the major sources of adsorption by BYB. The adsorption of dyes on BYB was negatively correlated with temperature, whereas with lead, it was positively correlated with temperature. The adsorption kinetic of methylene blue (MB), malachite green (MG), and lead on BYB were identified as pseudo-second order, whereas safranin O (SO) was identified as pseudo-first order. A low dosage of BYB effectively adsorbed four adsorbates and reached equilibrium in 3–5 min. The maximum monolayer adsorption capacities of BYB for MB, MG, SO, and lead were 212.05, 212.05, 76.77, and 106.88 mg/g, respectively.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03610470.2018.1561794

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The maximum monolayer adsorption capacities of brewer's yeast biomass for methylene blue, malachite green, and safranin O were 212.05, 212.05, and 76.77 mg/g, respectively.

    “The maximum monolayer adsorption capacities of BYB for MB, MG, and SO were 212.05, 212.05, and 76.77 mg/g, respectively.”

    From Biomass-Based Adsorbents for Removal of Dyes From Wastewater: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as Lin et al., 2019

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Kumar, S.R.; Chandrasekaran, M. Beverages. In Valorization of Food Processing by-Products, Chandrasekaran, M., Ed; CRC press: Boca Raton, 2012, pp 589–614. · DOI
  2. Mussatto S.-I, 2007, Biotechnology for Agro-Industrial Residues Utilization, 313
  3. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04170.x · DOI
  4. 10.1007/s00253-013-5063-y · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.desal.2010.11.040 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0304-386X(96)00059-X · DOI
  7. Jiang B.-H., 2012, Rhodotorula mucilaginosa. Adv. Biomed. Eng, 6, 185
  8. 10.1016/j.bej.2006.08.001 · DOI
  9. IUPAC, 1972, Pure Appl. Chem, 31, 585
  10. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.01.057 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.aquatox.2003.09.008 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/978-94-007-2229-3_16 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.042 · DOI
  14. 10.1021/la971218a · DOI
  15. 10.1007/s11356-013-2144-5 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.cej.2012.10.055 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.04.045 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s10924-012-0479-5 · DOI
  19. Skoog D.-A., 1997, Principles of Instrumental Analysis
  20. Bireller E.-S., 2012, J. Sci. Ind. Res, 71, 632
  21. Hart H., 2003, Organic Chemistry
  22. 10.1016/j.jcis.2006.10.054 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lin, H.-H., Stephen Inbaraj, B., & Kao, T.-H.
Affiliations
Department of Food Science, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
Venue
Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists
Published
2019-01-02
Volume
77
Issue
1
Pages
30-39
ISSN
  • 0361-0470
  • 1943-7854
Cited by
5
References
0
Language
en
Funders
National Science Council

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review