The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Some properties of clasical multi-dimesional scaling
Abstract
The paper gives a new optimal property of the classical method of multi-dimensional scaling when the distance matrix is non-Euclidean. We also examine robustness of the method under a linear model. A technique to estimate missing values is also given.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Existing and new approaches for the analysis of CATA data
Meyners, M., Castura, J. C., & Carr, B. T. (2013) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.06.010 · Cited by 477
Socio‐economic distance and spatial patterns in unemployment
Conley, T. G., & Topa, G. (2002) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.670 · Cited by 369
Partial distance correlation with methods for dissimilarities
Székely, G. J., & Rizzo, M. L. (2014) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/14-aos1255 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Mardia, K. V.
- Venue
- Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1978-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1233-1241
- ISSN
- 0361-0926 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-415X
- OpenAlex
- W2035753486
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Some properties of clasical multi-dimesional scaling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03610927808827707
- The paper
- Mardia, K. V. (1978). Some properties of clasical multi-dimesional scaling. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610927808827707
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
