The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Correcting for non-compliance in randomized trials using structural nested mean models
Abstract
In a randomized trial designed to study the effect of a treatment of interest on the evolution of the mean of a time-dependent outcome variable, subjects are assigned to a treatment regime, or, equivalently, a treatment protocol. Unfortunately, subjects often fail to comply with their assigned regime. From a public health point of view, the causal parameter of interest will often be a function of the treatment differences that would have been observed hadcontrary to fact, all subjects remained on protocol. This paper considers the identification and estimation of these treatment differences based on a new class of structural models, the multivariate structural nested mean models, when reliable estimates of each subject's actual treatment are available. Estimates of “actual treatment” might, for example, be obtained by measuring the amount of “active drug” in the subject's blood or urine at each follow-up visit or by pill counting techniques. In addition, we discuss a natural extension of our methods to observational studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistics and Causal Inference
Holland, P. W. (1986) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1986.10478354 · Cited by 5,293
Robins, J. (1986) · Mathematical Modelling · doi:10.1016/0270-0255(86)90088-6 · Cited by 2,451
Self-citationRobins, J. M., & Tsiatis, A. A. (1991) · Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610929108830654 · Cited by 423
Self-citation
Cited by
Endogenous Selection Bias: The Problem of Conditioning on a Collider Variable
Elwert, F., & Winship, C. (2014) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043455 · Cited by 1,168
Instruments for Causal Inference: An Epidemiologist's Dream?
Hernán, M. A., & Robins, J. M. (2006) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/01.ede.0000222409.00878.37 · Cited by 961
Self-citationBeyond the intention-to-treat in comparative effectiveness research
Hernán, M. A., & Hernández-Díaz, S. (2012) · Clinical Trials · doi:10.1177/1740774511420743 · Cited by 528
Causal Inference from Complex Longitudinal Data
Robins, J. M. (1997) · Lecture Notes in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1842-5_4 · Cited by 510
Self-citationMatching Methods for Causal Inference with Time‐Series Cross‐Sectional Data
Imai, K., Kim, I. S., & Wang, E. H. (2023) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12685 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Robins, J. M.
- Venue
- Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2379-2412
- ISSN
- 0361-0926 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-415X
- OpenAlex
- W2085227190
- Cited by
- 543
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correcting for non-compliance in randomized trials using structural nested mean models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03610929408831393
- The paper
- Robins, J. M. (1994). Correcting for non-compliance in randomized trials using structural nested mean models. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610929408831393
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.