The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Personal Practical Knowledge: A Study of Teachers' Classroom Images
Abstract
Teachers develop and use a special kind of knowledge. This knowledge is neither theoretical, in the sense of theories of learning, teaching, and curriculum, nor merely practical, in the sense of knowing children. If either of these were the essential ingredient of what teachers know, then it would be easy to see that others have a better knowledge of both; academics with better knowledge of the theoretical and parents and others with better knowledge of the practical. A teacher's special knowledge is composed of both kinds of knowledge, blended by the personal background and characteristics of the teacher and expressed by her in particular situations.The idea of “image” is one form of personal practical knowledge, the name given to this special practical knowledge of teachers (Clandinin, 1985; Connelly and Dienes, 1982). In this article I show how one teacher's image of the “classroom as home” embodies her personal and professional experience and how, in turn, the image is expressed in her classroom practices and in her practices in her personal life. Using a variety of classroom episodes gathered over two years with two teachers, I offer a theoretical outline of the experiential dimensions of an image and, in so doing, present image as a knowledge term which resides at the nexus of the theoretical, the practical, the objective, and the subjective.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Linking Theory and Practice: Changing the Pedagogy of Teacher Education
Korthagen, F. A. J., & Kessels, J. P. A. M. (1999) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x028004004 · Cited by 1,266
Personal History-Based Beliefs as Relevant Prior Knowledge in Course Work
Holt-Reynolds, D. (1992) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312029002325 · Cited by 488
“I teach students, not subjects”: Teacher‐student relationships as contexts for secondary literacy
Moje, E. B. (1996) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1598/rrq.31.2.4 · Cited by 157
Educating the reflective teacher: an essay review of two books by Donald Schon
Munby, H., & Russell, T. (1989) · Journal of Curriculum Studies · doi:10.1080/0022027890210106 · Cited by 113
(2008) · Indiana Magazine of History (Indiana University) · Cited by 54
The Dubious Place of Practical Arguments and Scientific Knowledge in the Thinking of Teachers
Munby, H. (1987) · Educational Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.1987.00361.x · Cited by 19
Impractical Philosophizing about Teachers' Arguments
Buchmann, M. (1987) · Educational Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.1987.00409.x · Cited by 15
Using narrative inquiry research methodology in online educational environments
Rice, M. F. (2024) · Educational technology research and development · doi:10.1007/s11423-023-10260-x · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Clandinin, D. J.
- Venue
- Curriculum Inquiry
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1985-12
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 361-385
- ISSN
- 0362-6784 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-873X
- OpenAlex
- W2079602750
- Cited by
- 567
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.