Cited by 1,266Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesReflective Practices in EducationMathematics Education and Teaching Techniques

Linking Theory and Practice: Changing the Pedagogy of Teacher Education

Korthagen, Fred A. J., Kessels, Jos P. A. M.·1999·Educational Researcher

Abstract

The pressure towards more school-based teacher education programs, visible in many countries, creates a need to rethink the relationship between theory and practice. The traditional application-of-theory model appears to be rather ineffective and is currently being replaced by other, more reflective approaches. However, until now the variety of different notions and assumptions underlying these new approaches have not provided a sound basis for further development. Two related theoretical bases are presented for a new paradigm in teacher education. The first uses the concepts of episteme and phronesis to introduce a new way of framing relevant knowledge. The second is a more holistic way of describing the relationship between teacher cognition and teacher behavior, leading to a model of three levels in learning about teaching, the Gestalt level, the schema level and the theory level, which are illustrated by interview data. Building on these two theoretical, frameworks, a so-called “realistic approach” to teacher education is introduced. The teacher educator's role within this approach is analyzed as well as organizational consequences. First evaluative results are presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0013189x028004004

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Analysis of Dutch and American standards for teacher education offers significant starting points for developing new modes of induction for pedagogy in English teacher education.

    “In developing these new modes of induction for pedagogy in English teacher education, analysis of the Dutch and American standards for teacher education (ATE, 2002; Korthagen, 2001; Korthagen & Kessels, 1999; Koster et al., 1998; Lunenberg, 2002) offers significant starting points”

    From Becoming a teacher educator: evidence from the field (2005) · cites this paper as Korthagen & Kessels, 1999

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Korthagen, F. A. J., & Kessels, J. P. A. M.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Korthagen, Fred A. J.
Venue
Educational Researcher
Published
1999-05
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
4-17
ISSN
  • 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-102X
OpenAlex
W2130395160
Cited by
1,266
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 73 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 73 · 2012: 54
FWCI
122.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Researcher (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Keywords
pedagogy teacher education, theory-practice integration, school-based teacher training, episteme, practical wisdom, teacher cognition, teacher behavior, realistic approach, teacher educator role, reflective practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review