CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 125Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Postpartum Substance Use and Depressive Symptoms: A Review

Open access
Chapman, Shawna L. Carroll, Wu, Li-Tzy·2013·Women & Health
DOI 10.1080/03630242.2013.804025PMC PMC3742364
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

National survey data suggest that new mothers have high prevalences of alcohol and illicit drug use. Depression correlates with substance use, and new mothers with postpartum depression may be at high risk for substance use. Understanding postpartum substance use and its relationship to postpartum depression can inform future research and intervention. A literature search was conducted resulting in 12 studies published from 1999-2012 examining postpartum alcohol use, drug use, or combined postpartum depression and substance use. Postpartum alcohol (prevalence range 30.1%-49%) and drug use (4.5%-8.5%) were lower than use among not pregnant, not postpartum women (41.5%-57.5%, 7.6%-10.6%, respectively) but higher than use among pregnant women (5.4%-11.6%, 3.7%-4.3%, respectively). Correlates of postpartum problem drinking were being unemployed, unmarried, and a cigarette smoker. Prevalence of drug use was highest among white new mothers, followed by blacks and Hispanics, but black new mothers appeared at greater risk of drug use. No identified studies examined correlates of postpartum drug use beyond race/ethnicity. Postpartum depressive symptoms were prevalent among postpartum substance users and those with a substance use history (19.7%-46%). The postpartum period is a critical time. Prevalent substance use and the scarcity of studies warrant research to identify means to reduce maternal substance use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03630242.2013.804025

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Bryan T. L., 1999, J Reprod Med, 44, 351
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2012, Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 61, 10
  3. Jagodzinski T., 2007, Wis Med J, 106, 319
  4. Marcus S. M., 2009, Canadian J Clin Pharmacol, 16, e15
  5. McLeod D., 2002, NZ Med J, 115, 1
  6. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), 2001, The NHSDA report: Pregnancy and illicit drug use
  7. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), 2003, Results from the 2002 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of national finding. (DHHS Publication No. SMA 03-3836, NHSDA Series H-22)
  8. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), 2005, The NHSDA Report, Substance use during pregnancy: 2002 and 2003 update
  9. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), 2005, The NSDUH report
  10. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), 2008, Alcohol use among pregnant and recent mothers: 2002 to 2007

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 125

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Chapman, S. L. C., & Wu, L.-T.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Chapman, Shawna L. Carroll
ORCID
Wu, Li-Tzy
Venue
Women & Health
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2013-07
Volume
53
Issue
5
Pages
479-503
ISSN
  • 0363-0242 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0331
DOI
10.1080/03630242.2013.804025
PMC
PMC3742364
OpenAlex
W1981164640
Cited by
125
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Women & Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA019623, R33DA027503, R01DA019901)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
postpartum depression, illicit drug use, maternal substance use, depressive symptoms, prevalence, racial and ethnic differences, smoking, unemployment, marital status, pregnant women
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Alcohol Drinking, Female, Humans, Mothers, Pregnancy, Depression, Postpartum, Substance-Related Disorders, Postpartum Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review