The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Adapting Adaptive Management for Testing the Effectiveness of Stream Restoration: An Intensively Monitored Watershed Example
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“One approach is to use an experimental design as part of the restoration, such as a staircase model (Walters et al. 1988;Bouwes et al. 2016) that would deliberately complete the restoration in stages such that environmental changes are separable from restoration effects.”
From Adaptive Management in Practice and the Problem of Application at Multiple Scales—Insights from Oyster Reef Restoration on Florida’s Gulf Coast (2022) · cites this paper as Bouwes et al. 2016
In the citing paper
“We feel strongly than an adaptive management process can help other restoration projects to identify critical uncertainties and guide restoration actions away from trial and error toward evidence-based approaches (Bouwes et al. 2016;Friberg et al. 2016), thereby increasing the likelihood of restoration success.”
From Adaptive Management in Practice and the Problem of Application at Multiple Scales—Insights from Oyster Reef Restoration on Florida’s Gulf Coast (2022) · cites this paper as Bouwes et al. 2016
In the citing paper
“We feel strongly than an adaptive management process can help other restoration projects to identify critical uncertainties and guide restoration actions away from trial and error toward evidence-based approaches (Bouwes et al. 2016;Friberg et al. 2016), thereby increasing the likelihood of restoration success.”
From Adaptive Management in Practice and the Problem of Application at Multiple Scales—Insights from Oyster Reef Restoration on Florida’s Gulf Coast (2022) · cites this paper as Bouwes et al. 2016
In the citing paper
“We feel strongly than an adaptive management process can help other restoration projects to identify critical uncertainties and guide restoration actions away from trial and error toward evidence-based approaches (Bouwes et al. 2016;Friberg et al. 2016), thereby increasing the likelihood of restoration success.”
From Adaptive Management in Practice and the Problem of Application at Multiple Scales—Insights from Oyster Reef Restoration on Florida’s Gulf Coast (2022) · cites this paper as Bouwes et al. 2016
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Allen, 2011, Adaptive management for a turbulent future, Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 1339, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.019 · DOI
- Allen, 2011, Pathology and failure in the design and implementation of adaptive management, Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 1379, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.063 · DOI · Paper page
- Bennett, 2016, Progress and challenges of testing the effectiveness of stream restoration in the Pacific Northwest using intensively monitored watersheds, Fisheries, 41, 92, 10.1080/03632415.2015.1127805 · DOI
- Bernhardt, 2005, Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts, Science, 308, 636, 10.1126/science.1109769 · DOI · Paper page
- Camp, 2015, Short-term effectiveness of high density large woody debris, a cheap and cheerful restoration action, in Asotin Creek
- Camp, 2014, Streamlining field data collection with mobile apps, Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 95, 453, 10.1002/2014EO490001 · DOI
- Downs, 2002, Post-project appraisals in adaptive management of river channel restoration, Journal of Environmental Management, 29, 477
- Gregory, 2006, Deconstructing adaptive management: criteria for applications to environmental management, Ecological Applications, 16, 2411, 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2411:DAMCFA]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Holling, 1978, Adaptive environmental assessment and management
- McFadden, 2011, Evaluating the efficacy of adaptive management approaches: is there a formula for success?, Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 1354, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.038 · DOI
- Rieman, 2015, A comprehensive approach for habitat restoration in Columbia River Basin, Fisheries, 40, 124, 10.1080/03632415.2015.1007205 · DOI
- Roni, 2008, Global review of physical and biological effectiveness of stream habitat rehabilitation techniques, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 28, 856, 10.1577/M06-169.1 · DOI
- Rosenfeld, 2014, Successes, failures, and opportunities in the practical application of drift-foraging models, Environmental Biology of Fishes, 97, 551, 10.1007/s10641-013-0195-6 · DOI
- Sabine, 2004, Adaptive management: a synthesis of current understanding and effective application, Ecological Management and Restoration, 5, 177, 10.1111/j.1442-8903.2004.00206.x · DOI
- Wall, 2016, Net rate of energy intake predicts reach-level Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) densities in diverse basins from a large monitoring program, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 10.1139/cjfas-2015-0290 · DOI
- Walters, 1990, Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing, Ecology, 71, 2060, 10.2307/1938620 · DOI
- Walters, 1986, Adaptive management of renewable resources
- Walters, 1988, Experimental designs for estimating transient responses to management disturbances, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 45, 530, 10.1139/f88-062 · DOI · Paper page
- Williams, 2011, Passive and active adaptive management: approaches and an example, Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 1371, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.039 · DOI · Paper page
- Williams, 2009, Adaptive management: the U.S. Department of the Interior technical guide
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pine, W. E., Johnson, F. A., Frederick, P. C., & Coggins, L. G. (2022) · Marine and Coastal Fisheries · doi:10.1002/mcf2.10192 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Bouwes, N., Bennett, S., & Wheaton, J.
- Affiliations
- Eco Logical Research Inc., Providence, UT
- Watershed Sciences, Utah State University, 5210 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT, 84322-5210
- Watershed Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT
- Venue
- Fisheries
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-01-28
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 84-91
- ISSN
- 0363-2415
- 1548-8446
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2016-04-06)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adapting Adaptive Management for Testing the Effectiveness of Stream Restoration: An Intensively Monitored Watershed Example. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03632415.2015.1127806
- The paper
- Bouwes, N., Bennett, S., & Wheaton, J. (2016). Adapting Adaptive Management for Testing the Effectiveness of Stream Restoration: An Intensively Monitored Watershed Example. Fisheries. https://doi.org/10.1080/03632415.2015.1127806
