Cited by 1,903Hydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesFish Ecology and Management StudiesIntegrated Water Resources Management

Synthesizing U.S. River Restoration Efforts

Bernhardt, E. S., Palmer, M. A., Allan, J. D., Alexander, G., Barnas, K., Brooks, S., Carr, J., Clayton, S. +17 more·2005·Science

Abstract

3,4085MetricsTotal Downloads3,408Last 6 Months498Last 12 Months1,067Total Citations5Last 6 Months0Last 12 Months0View all metrics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1109769

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a synthesis of river restoration projects across the USA, Bernhardt et al. (2005) highlighted the lack of long-term monitoring as a major impediment to evaluating restoration success.

    “In a synthesis of river restoration pro­ jects across the USA, Bernhardt et al. (2005) highlighted the lack of long-term monitoring as a major impediment to evaluating restoration success.”
  • The lack of significant ecological improvements may reflect the generally poor understanding of ecological response to any restoration activity.

    “but may also reflect the generally poor understanding of ecological response to any restoration activity (Bernhardt et al. 2005;Palmer et al. 2005;Bernhardt and Palmer 2007).”
  • Despite long-term investments in restoring aquatic ecosystems, it has proven difficult to adequately synthesize and evaluate program outcomes, and no standard method has been adopted.

    “Despite long-term investments in restoring aquatic ecosystems, it has proven difficult to adequately synthesize and evaluate program outcomes, and no standard method has been adopted.”

    From Evidence‐based evaluation of the cumulative effects of ecosystem restoration (2016) · cites this paper as Bernhardt et al. 2005

  • Documentation and efficiency analysis of river restoration projects have been strongly neglected in the Global North for a long time.

    “Documentation and efficiency analysis of river restoration projects have been strongly neglected in the Global North for a long time (e.g., Europe [16][17][18][19], Australia [20] and North America [21,22]).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bernhardt, E. S., Palmer, M. A., Allan, J. D., Alexander, G., Barnas, K., Brooks, S., Carr, J., Clayton, S., Dahm, C., Follstad-Shah, J., Galat, D., Gloss, S., Goodwin, P., Hart, D., Hassett, B., Jenkinson, R., Katz, S., Kondolf, G. M., Lake, P. S., Lave, R., Meyer, J. L., O'Donnell, T. K., Pagano, L., Powell, B., & Sudduth, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts (US)
  • University of Idaho (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
  • Bernhardt, E. S.
  • Sudduth, E.
Venue
Science
Published
2005-04-29
Volume
308
Issue
5722
Pages
636-637
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2125454074
Cited by
1,903
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 91 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 125 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 121 · 2017: 100 · 2016: 100 · 2015: 113 · 2014: 108 · 2013: 108 · 2012: 93
FWCI
64.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Integrated Water Resources Management
Keywords
river restoration, freshwater ecosystems, United States
MeSH terms
Animals, Conservation of Natural Resources, Costs and Cost Analysis, Environment, Fishes, United States, Databases, Factual, Ecosystem, Rivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review