The DOI matches its Crossref record; 120 of the 120 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Meta-Analysis of Research on Inoculation Theory
Abstract
A meta-analysis of 54 cases testing the effectiveness of inoculation theory at conferring resistance and examining the mechanisms of the theory was conducted. The analyses revealed inoculation messages to be superior to both supportive messages and no-treatment controls at conferring resistance. Additionally, the results revealed refutational same and refutational different preemptions to be equally effective at reducing attitude change. However, the data were not consistent with some predictions made in narrative reviews of inoculation. No significant increase in resistance as a function of threat or involvement was found. Further, instead of a curvilinear effect for delay on resistance, the point estimates from our meta-analysis revealed equivalent resistance between immediate and moderate delays between inoculation and attack, with a decay in resistance after two weeks.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A meta-analysis has found inoculation effective in protecting attitudes from persuasion 130 .”
From Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response (2020) · cites this paper as [130]
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-3352 · Cited by 36,647
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
Book Review: The Psychology of Attitudes
Chakravarti, D., Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1997) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151869 · Cited by 7,173
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1 · Cited by 5,219
Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change
Marquart, F., & Naderer, B. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-09923-7_20 · Cited by 5,011
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · DOI · Paper page
- *An , C. 2003 . Efficacy of inoculation strategies in promoting resistance to political attack messages: Source credibility perspective . Unpublished doctoral dissertation , University of Oklahoma .
- 10.1207/s15567419cy2901_4 · DOI
- *Davis , C. M. 1965 . An experimental analysis of propaganda-resistance-conferring techniques for controversial and non-controversial issues . Unpublished doctoral dissertation , University of Iowa .
- 10.1002/mar.4220120509 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-08-057065-5.50010-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1162/105474603321640932 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0044782 · DOI
- *Koehler , J. W. 1968 . Effects on audience opinion of one-sided and two-sided speeches supporting and opposing a proposition, examining opinions on speaker's ethos, the topic and the “open mindedness” of listeners . Unpublished doctoral dissertation , Pennsylvania State University .
- *Lee , W.-P. 1997 . The effects of cognitive and affective inoculation appeals in conferring resistance against cognitive and affective attacks . Unpublished doctoral dissertation , University of Wisconsin at Madison .
- *MacDougall , B. L. 2001 . The role of attitude bases and argument type in the inoculation effect . Unpublished Master's thesis , Queen's University .
- 10.1111/j.1468–2958.2007.00290_2.x · DOI
- Pfau , M. 1997 . “ The inoculation model of resistance to influence ” . In Progress in communication sciences: Advances in persuasion , Edited by: Barnett , G. A. and Boster , F. J. Vol. 13 , 133 – 171 . Greenwich, CT : Ablex .
- *Pfau , M. , Compton , J. , Parker , K. Wittenberg , E. , An , C. , Ferguson , M. et al. . 2003 . Inoculation, mental processing, and time: The short- and long-term influence of associative networks in the process of resistance to counterattitudinal influence . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association , San Diego, CA .
- 10.1080/03637750302474 · DOI
- *Shapiro , M. E. 1978 . The effect of belief type, pretreatment strategy, and language intensity on the induction of resistance to persuasion . Unpublished doctoral dissertation , Florida State University .
- Szabo , E. A. , & Pfau , M. 2001 , November . Reactance as a response to antismoking messages . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association , Atlanta, GA .
- *Wood , M. L. M. 2006 . Expertise and prior attitude: Exploring new moderators in the context of inoculation research . Unpublished doctoral dissertation , University of Wisconsin at Madison .
- *Yin , S. 2003 . Priming in the inoculation process: An alternative route of resistance to persuasion . Unpublished doctoral dissertation , University of Wisconsin at Madison .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 509
Dillingham, L. L., & Ivanov, B. (2017) · Journal of Applied Communication Research · doi:10.1080/00909882.2017.1320571 · Cited by 32
Managing Infodemics in the 21st Century
Purnat, T. D., Nguyen, T., & Briand, S. C. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-27789-4 · Cited by 54
Mitigating bias blind spot via a serious video game
Bessarabova, E., Piercy, C. W., King, S., Vincent, C. S., Dunbar, N. E., Burgoon, J. K., Miller, C. H., Jensen, M. L., Elkins, A. C., Wilson, D. W., et al. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.089 · Cited by 39
How detailed product information strengthens eco-friendly consumption
Osburg, V., Yoganathan, V., Brueckner, S., & Toporowski, W. (2019) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-10-2017-1012 · Cited by 50
Wang, W., & Huang, Y. (2020) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547020974384 · Cited by 36
Caserotti, M., Gavaruzzi, T., Girardi, P., Tasso, A., Buizza, C., Candini, V., Zarbo, C., Chiarotti, F., Brescianini, S., Calamandrei, G., et al. (2021) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106885 · Cited by 38
Inoculating Against Anti-Vaccination Conspiracies
Banas, J. A., Bessarabova, E., Penkauskas, M. C., & Talbert, N. (2023) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2023.2235733 · Cited by 19
Self-citationStrategies for Effective Public Health Communication in a Complex Information Environment
Niederdeppe, J., Boyd, A. D., King, A. J., & Rimal, R. N. (2024) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-071723-120721 · Cited by 43
Sustainable attitudes: Protecting tourism with inoculation messages
Ivanov, B., Dillingham, L. L., Parker, K. A., Rains, S. A., Burchett, M. R., & Geegan, S. A. (2018) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2018.08.006 · Cited by 35
Self-citationDixon, H., Scully, M. L., Gascoyne, C., & Wakefield, M. A. (2020) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-020-09881-1 · Cited by 36
Zerback, T., & Toepfl, F. (2021) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12767 · Cited by 34
The future of behavioral insights: on the importance of socially situated nudges
van der Linden, S. (2018) · Behavioural Public Policy · doi:10.1017/bpp.2018.22 · Cited by 34
Tackling misinformation with games: a systematic literature review
Kiili, K. J. M., Siuko, J., & Ninaus, M. (2024) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2299999 · Cited by 57
Re-Thinking Anxiety: Using Inoculation Messages to Reduce and Reinterpret Public Speaking Fears
Jackson, B., Compton, J., Thornton, A., & Dimmock, J. A. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169972 · Cited by 33
A call to think broadly about information literacy.
Marsh, E. J., & Yang, B. W. (2017) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.012 · Cited by 34
Lees, J. M., Banas, J. A., Linvill, D. L., Meirick, P. C., & Warren, P. L. (2023) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad094 · Cited by 33
Self-citationPilditch, T. D., Roozenbeek, J., Madsen, J. K., & van der Linden, S. (2022) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.211953 · Cited by 46
Kresin, S., Kremer, K., & Büssing, A. G. (2024) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21855 · Cited by 32
On Cyber-Enabled Information Warfare and Information Operations
Lin, H., & Kerr, J. A. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198800682.013.15 · Cited by 35
A Meta-Analysis of the Functional Matching Effect Based on Functional Attitude Theory
Carpenter, C. J. (2012) · Southern Communication Journal · doi:10.1080/1041794x.2012.699989 · Cited by 35
Iles, I. A., Gillman, A. S., Platter, H. N., Ferrer, R. A., & Klein, W. M. P. (2021) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/10755470211048480 · Cited by 32
Biddlestone, M., Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2022) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.4025 · Cited by 32
Negative Affect as a Mechanism of Exemplification Effects
Dixon, G. (2015) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650215579222 · Cited by 29
Jackson, B., Compton, J., Whiddett, R., Anthony, D. R., & Dimmock, J. A. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124886 · Cited by 29
Ferrero, M., Konstantinidis, E., & Vadillo, M. A. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.577738 · Cited by 32
Diddi, P., & Wei, L. (2022) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102206 · Cited by 31
Clayton, R. B., Compton, J., Reynolds‐Tylus, T., Neumann, D., & Park, J. (2022) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1093/hcr/hqac026 · Cited by 28
Ma, J., Chen, Y., Zhu, H., & Gan, Y. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20020980 · Cited by 28
Liars know they are lying: differentiating disinformation from disagreement
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Cook, J., van der Linden, S., Roozenbeek, J., Орескес, Н., & McIntyre, L. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03503-6 · Cited by 38
de Bruin, W. B., & Wong‐Parodi, G. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000008 · Cited by 27
Huskey, R., Wilcox, S., Clayton, R. B., & Keene, J. R. (2020) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2020.1839939 · Cited by 26
Inoculation theory and public relations
Compton, J., Wigley, S., & Samoilenko, S. (2021) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102116 · Cited by 22
Gamified Inoculation Against Misinformation in India: A Randomized Control Trial
Harjani, T., Basol, M., Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2023) · Journal of Trial and Error · doi:10.36850/e12 · Cited by 34
Fransen, M. L., & Fennis, B. M. (2014) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12118 · Cited by 25
Richards, A. S., Bessarabova, E., Banas, J. A., & Larsen, M. (2021) · Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01463373.2021.1920443 · Cited by 25
Self-citationNeylan, J., Biddlestone, M., Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-43885-2 · Cited by 33
Using Postinoculation Talk to Strengthen Generated Resistance
Dillingham, L. L., & Ivanov, B. (2016) · Communication Research Reports · doi:10.1080/08824096.2016.1224161 · Cited by 24
Timmons, S., Whelan, A., & Kelly, C. A. M. (2024) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2024.03.030 · Cited by 36
Processing of misinformation as motivational and cognitive biases
Zhou, Y., & Shen, L. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1430953 · Cited by 30
Richards, A. S., & Banas, J. A. (2018) · Southern Communication Journal · doi:10.1080/1041794x.2018.1498909 · Cited by 24
Self-citationModelling anti-vaccine sentiment as a cultural pathogen
Mehta, R. S., & Rosenberg, N. A. (2020) · Evolutionary Human Sciences · doi:10.1017/ehs.2020.17 · Cited by 24
Combatting Climate Change Misinformation: Current Strategies and Future Directions
Chen, L. (2024) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2023.2299756 · Cited by 23
Niederdeppe, J., Winett, L. B., Xu, Y., Fowler, E. F., & Gollust, S. E. (2021) · Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1468-0009.12534 · Cited by 24
Vaccination against misinformation: The inoculation technique reduces the continued influence effect
Buczel, K. A., Szyszka, P. D., Siwiak, A., Szpitalak, M., & Polczyk, R. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0267463 · Cited by 22
Let Me Think about It: Cognitive Elaboration and Strategies of Resistance to Political Persuasion
Valli, C., & Nai, A. (2022) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213269.2022.2098774 · Cited by 24
Jiang, L. C., Sun, M.-R., Chu, T.-H., & Chia, S. C. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.976091 · Cited by 19
Examining characteristics of prebunking strategies to overcome PR disinformation attacks
Boman, C. D. (2021) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102105 · Cited by 28
Heiss, R., Naderer, B., & Matthes, J. (2020) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/daaa086 · Cited by 28
Perry, L. M., Sartor, O. A., Malhotra, S., Alonzi, S. P., Kim, S., Voss, H. M., Rogers, J. L., Robinson, W., Harris, K. M., Shank, J., et al. (2021) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.03.027 · Cited by 22
Interdisciplinary Approaches to COVID-19
Moradian, N., Moallemian, M., Delavari, F., Sedikides, C., Camargo, C. A., Torres, P. J., Sorooshian, A., Mehdiabadi, S. P., Nieto, J. J., Bordas, S., et al. (2021) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-63761-3_52 · Cited by 23
Boman, C. D. (2023) · Journal of Public Relations Research · doi:10.1080/1062726x.2023.2195184 · Cited by 8
Inoculation message treatments for curbing noncommunicable disease development.
Mason, A. M., & Miller, C. H. (2013) · PubMed · Cited by 20
Krishna, A. (2021) · Journal of Public Relations Research · doi:10.1080/1062726x.2021.1944155 · Cited by 20
The Role of Threat and Counterarguing in Therapeutic Inoculation
Ivanov, B., Rains, S. A., Dillingham, L. L., Parker, K. A., Geegan, S. A., & Barbati, J. L. (2021) · Southern Communication Journal · doi:10.1080/1041794x.2021.1983012 · Cited by 20
Self-citationDer strategische Einsatz von Fake News zur Propaganda im Wahlkampf
Schmid, C. E., Stock, L., & Walter, S. (2018) · Aktivismus- und Propagandaforschung · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-22118-8_4 · Cited by 20
Inoculation Theory as a Strategic Tool
Ivanov, B., Parker, K. A., & Dillingham, L. L. (2020) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119399926.ch1 · Cited by 21
A Spherical Rendering of Deviant Information Resilience
Hopp, T., & Ferrucci, P. (2020) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1077699020916428 · Cited by 15
Logan, A. C., Berman, S. H., Berman, B., & Prescott, S. L. (2021) · Challenges · doi:10.3390/challe12010001 · Cited by 23
Countering AI-generated misinformation with pre-emptive source discreditation and debunking
Spearing, E. R., Gile, C. I., Fogwill, A. L., Prike, T., Swire‐Thompson, B., Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2025) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.242148 · Cited by 32
Prebunking Against Misinformation in the Modern Digital Age
Traberg, C. S., Harjani, T., Basol, M., Biddlestone, M., Maertens, R., Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-27789-4_8 · Cited by 20
Cemiloglu, D., Gurgun, S., Arden-Close, E. J., Jiang, N., & Ali, R. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2281744 · Cited by 18
Who Can You Trust? Assessing Vulnerability to Digital Imposter Scams
Robb, C. A., & Wendel, S. (2022) · Journal of Consumer Policy · doi:10.1007/s10603-022-09531-6 · Cited by 17
Bernsteiner, A., Schubatzky, T., & Haagen‐Schützenhöfer, C. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15108161 · Cited by 17
Cook, J., Lepage, C., Hopkins, K. L., Cook, W., Kolog, E. A., Thomson, A., Iddrisu, I., & Burnette, S. (2024) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/21645515.2024.2407204 · Cited by 17
Risky Behaviors: Integrating Adolescent Egocentrism with the Theory of Planned Behavior
Lin, P. S. (2016) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/gpr0000086 · Cited by 17
Countering Superintelligence Misinformation
Baum, S. D. (2018) · Information · doi:10.3390/info9100244 · Cited by 18
A signal detection theory meta-analysis of psychological inoculation against misinformation
Simchon, A., Zipori, T., Teitelbaum, L., Lewandowsky, S., & van der Linden, S. (2025) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102194 · Cited by 24
Compton, J., & Craig, E. (2019) · Journal of Family Theory & Review · doi:10.1111/jftr.12328 · Cited by 16
Schubatzky, T., & Haagen-Schützenhöfer, C. (2022) · Education sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci12080566 · Cited by 10
Trusted sources for COVID-19 testing and vaccination: lessons for future health communication
Kroll, C., McQueen, A., Vega, V. D. L., Marsh, A. K., Poor, T. J., Verdecias, N., Caburnay, C. A., & Kreuter, M. W. (2023) · Journal of Communications In Healthcare · doi:10.1080/17538068.2023.2255408 · Cited by 16
Brinson, N. H. (2022) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2021.760847 · Cited by 16
Trump Trumps Baldwin? How Trump’s Tweets Transform SNL into Trump’s Strategic Advantage
Becker, A. B. (2017) · Journal of Political Marketing · doi:10.1080/15377857.2017.1411860 · Cited by 16
Psychological Booster Shots Targeting Memory Increase Long-Term Resistance Against MisinformationPreprint
Maertens, R., Roozenbeek, J., Simons, J. S., Lewandowsky, S., Maturo, V., Goldberg, B., Xu, R., & van der Linden, S. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/6r9as · Cited by 16
Optimising Emotions, Incubating Falsehoods
Bakir, V., & McStay, A. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-13551-4 · Cited by 20
Mason, A., Compton, J., Tice, E., Peterson, B., Lewis, I., Glenn, T., & Combs, T. (2023) · Communication Reports · doi:10.1080/08934215.2023.2256803 · Cited by 9
Exploring the Design of Technology-Mediated Nudges for Online Misinformation
Konstantinou, L., Panos, D., & Karapanos, E. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2301265 · Cited by 16
Students' awareness and conceptions of science‐related communication mechanisms on social media
Kresin, S., Kremer, K., Nehring, A., & Büssing, A. G. (2024) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21973 · Cited by 24
Countering misinformation: Strategies, challenges, and uncertainties
Peter, C., & Koch, T. (2019) · Studies in Communication and Media · doi:10.5771/2192-4007-2019-4-431 · Cited by 16
Baselga, S. V., Garrido, O. M., & Burón, H. G. (2020) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-020-09939-5 · Cited by 15
Dixon, H., Scully, M. L., Wakefield, M. A., Kelly, B., Pettigrew, S., Chapman, K. L., & Niederdeppe, J. (2020) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113415 · Cited by 15
Using infographics to improve trust in science: a randomized pilot test
Agley, J. D., Xiao, Y., Thompson, E. E., & Golzarri‐Arroyo, L. (2021) · BMC Research Notes · doi:10.1186/s13104-021-05626-4 · Cited by 18
Okuno, H., Arai, S., Suzuki, M., & Kikkawa, T. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.775486 · Cited by 15
Appel, R. E., Roozenbeek, J., Rayburn-Reeves, R. M., Basol, M., Corbin, J. C., Compton, J., & van der Linden, S. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-09462-5 · Cited by 17
Ivanov, B., Hester, E. B., Martin, J. C., Silberman, W. R., Slone, A., Goatley-Soan, S., Geegan, S. A., Parker, K. A., Herrington, T. F., Riker, S., et al. (2020) · Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01463373.2020.1850492 · Cited by 14
Media framing and public support for China’s social credit system: An experimental study
Xu, P., Krueger, B. S., Liang, F., Zhang, M., Hutchison, M. L., & Chang, M. (2023) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448231187823 · Cited by 14
Hu, B., Ju, X., Liu, H., Wu, H.-Q., Bi, C., & Lu, C. F. (2023) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-023-00505-x · Cited by 19
Sutherland, M. (2016) · Health Psychology Open · doi:10.1177/2055102916679349 · Cited by 15
Ivanov, B., Sellnow, T., Getchell, M. C., & Burns, W. (2018) · Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management · doi:10.1111/1468-5973.12213 · Cited by 10
Scully, M. L., Brennan, E., Durkin, S. J., Dixon, H., Wakefield, M. A., Barry, C. L., & Niederdeppe, J. (2017) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4972-6 · Cited by 14
Levine, T. R., & Weber, R. (2020) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1093/hcr/hqz019 · Cited by 13
Yao, Q. (2021) · Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1108/jrim-09-2019-0141 · Cited by 13
Barbati, J. L., Rains, S. A., Ivanov, B., & Banas, J. A. (2021) · Communication Research Reports · doi:10.1080/08824096.2021.1956450 · Cited by 13
Self-citationAung, K. W., Soubutts, E., & Singh, A. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3677113 · Cited by 24
How do we raise media bias awareness effectively? Effects of visualizations to communicate bias
Spinde, T., Jeggle, C., Haupt, M., Gaissmaier, W., & Giese, H. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0266204 · Cited by 15
Dimmock, J. A., Gagné, M., Proud, L., Howle, T. C., Rebar, A. L., & Jackson, B. (2016) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.2016-0146 · Cited by 13
Enhancing Inoculation: Examining the Relationships among Attack Certainty, Threat and Resistance
Ivanov, B., Parker, K. A., Dillingham, L. L., Petrun, E. L., Grant, L. F., & Geegan, S. A. (2013) · International Journal of Neuroscience and Behavioral Science · doi:10.13189/ijnbs.2013.010201 · Cited by 12
Feltrero, R., Hernando, S., & Ionescu, A. (2023) · American Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.1080/08923647.2023.2231814 · Cited by 12
How do inoculation messages work? A two-study mixed-method investigation into inoculation mechanisms
Clear, S. E., Dimmock, J. A., Compton, J., & Jackson, B. (2021) · Asian Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/01292986.2021.1888306 · Cited by 12
Implementasi Pendekatan Saintifik dalam Pembelajaran IPA di Indonesia : Suatu Meta-Analisis
Elvianasti, M., Lufri, L., Asrizal, A., & Rikizaputra, R. (2021) · EDUKATIF JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN · doi:10.31004/edukatif.v4i1.1819 · Cited by 17
A Primer on Practical SignificancePreprint
Silan, M. A. A. (2019) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/zdhfe · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Banas, J. A., & Rains, S. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Oklahoma (US)
- University of Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- Banas, John A.
- Venue
- Communication Monographs
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 281-311
- ISSN
- 0363-7751 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-5787
- OpenAlex
- W2144729414
- Cited by
- 510
- References
- 116
- Citations by year
- 2026: 82 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Communication Monographs (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
- Keywords
- inoculation theory, attitude change, threat level, audience involvement, persuasion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review