The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Relation Between Essentialist Beliefs and Evolutionary Reasoning
Open accessAbstract
Historians of science have pointed to essentialist beliefs about species as major impediments to the discovery of natural selection. The present study investigated whether such beliefs are impediments to learning this concept as well. Participants (43 children aged 4-9 and 34 adults) were asked to judge the variability of various behavioral and anatomical properties across different members of the same species. Adults who accepted within-species variation-both actual and potential-were significantly more likely to demonstrate a selection-based understanding of evolution than adults who denied within-species variation. The latter demonstrated an alternative, incorrect understanding of evolution and produced response patterns that were both quantitatively and qualitatively similar to those produced by preschool-aged children. Overall, it is argued that psychological essentialism, although a useful bias for drawing species-wide inductions, leads individuals to devalue within-species variation and, consequently, to fail to understand natural selection.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, in spite of the obvious adaptive rationality of this cognitive predisposition, 83 psychological essentialism regularly interferes with a scientifically informed biological 84 understanding [27].”
From Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition (2015) · cites this paper as [27]
Citations
Cites
The growth of biological thought. Diversity, evolution, and inheritance
Farner, D. S. (1983) · The Auk · doi:10.1093/auk/100.2.507 · Cited by 2,503
The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance
Mayr, E. (1982) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 2,295
Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development
Keil, F. C. (1989) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2065.001.0001 · Cited by 1,886
Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-1926 · Cited by 1,822
Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development
Keil, F. C. (1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3559 · Cited by 1,699
Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics
Clement, J. (1982) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.12989 · Cited by 1,258
Gould, S. J. (1996) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674063396 · Cited by 998
Common sense concepts about motion
Halloun, I. A., & Hestenes, D. (1985) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.14031 · Cited by 852
Insides and essences: Early understandings of the non-obvious
Gelman, S. A., & Wellman, H. M. (1991) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(91)90007-q · Cited by 802
Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution
Bishop, B. A., & Anderson, C. (1990) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.3660270503 · Cited by 791
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 214
How generic language shapes the development of social thought
Rhodes, M., Gelman, S. A., & Leslie, S. (2024) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2024.09.012 · Cited by 18
Making science come alive : Student-generated stop-motion animations in science education
Orraryd, D. (2021) · Studies in science and technology education · doi:10.3384/diss.diva-173038 · Cited by 16
Exploring the relation between people’s theories of intelligence and beliefs about brain development
Thomas, A. J., & Sarnecka, B. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00921 · Cited by 13
Rethinking the Role of Resubsumption in Conceptual Change
Shtulman, A. (2009) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520802616275 · Cited by 15
Self-citationEssentialist Reasoning about the Biological World
Gelman, S. (2009) · Research and perspectives in neurosciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85897-3_2 · Cited by 18
Barnes, M. E., Aini, R. Q., Collins, J. P., Dunk, R. D. P., Holt, E. A., Jensen, J. L., Klein, J. R., Misheva, T., Nadelson, L. S., Reiss, M. J., et al. (2024) · Evolution Education and Outreach · doi:10.1186/s12052-024-00194-0 · Cited by 16
Self-citationBiological Variation as a Threshold Concept: Can We Measure Threshold Crossing?
Walck-Shannon, E. M., Batzli, J., Pultorak, J. D., & Boehmer, H. (2019) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.18-12-0241 · Cited by 15
Pickett, S. B., Nielson, C., Marshall, H., Tanner, K. D., & Coley, J. D. (2022) · Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education · doi:10.1128/jmbe.00220-21 · Cited by 21
The Development of Diagnostic Inference About Uncertain Causes
Sobel, D. M., Erb, C. D., Tassin, T., & Weisberg, D. S. (2017) · Journal of Cognition and Development · doi:10.1080/15248372.2017.1387117 · Cited by 14
Metz, K. E., Cardace, A., Berson, E., Ly, U., Wong, N., Sisk-Hilton, S., Metz, S. E., & Wilson, M. R. (2019) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2019.1667806 · Cited by 18
Development of the Biological Variation In Experimental Design And Analysis (BioVEDA) assessment
Hicks, J., Dewey, J. L., Brandvain, Y. J., & Schuchardt, A. M. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236098 · Cited by 13
Designing Exhibits to Support Relational Learning in a Science Museum
Jee, B. D., & Anggoro, F. K. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.636030 · Cited by 13
Kalinowski, S. T., Andrews, T. M., Leonard, M. J., & Snodgrass, M. A. (2012) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.11-09-0087 · Cited by 13
Metacognitive Regulation of Essentialism in the Teaching of Evolution
Pérez, G., Galindo, A. A. G., & Galli, L. G. (2022) · Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education · doi:10.21601/ijese/12223 · Cited by 12
Intuitive biological thinking in Chinese 8th graders
Xu, Y., & Coley, J. D. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105511 · Cited by 13
Can we get human nature right?
Berent, I. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2108274118 · Cited by 12
Developmental Changes in Strategies for Gathering Evidence About Biological Kinds
Foster‐Hanson, E., Moty, K., Cardarelli, A., Ocampo, J. D., & Rhodes, M. (2020) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12837 · Cited by 11
Representing Variability: The Case of Life Cycle Diagrams
Menéndez, D., Mathiaparanam, O. N., Liu, D., Seitz, V., Alibali, M. W., & Rosengren, K. S. (2020) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.19-11-0251 · Cited by 14
Cognitive constraints influence an understanding of life-cycle change
French, J. A., Menéndez, D., Herrmann, P. A., Evans, E. M., & Rosengren, K. S. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2018.03.018 · Cited by 11
Stern, F., Kampourakis, K., & Müller, A. (2022) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21796 · Cited by 13
Rhodes, M. (2020) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/11970.003.0022 · Cited by 9
Students explain evolution by natural selection differently for humans versus nonhuman animals
de Lima, J., & Long, T. M. (2023) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.21-06-0145 · Cited by 11
Nielson, C., Pitt, E., Fux, M., de Nesnera, K., Betz, N., Leffers, J. S., Tanner, K. D., & Coley, J. D. (2025) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.24-07-0198 · Cited by 10
Psychological essentialism from first principles
Quillien, T. (2018) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.07.003 · Cited by 9
The “Species” Concept as a Gateway to Nature of Science
Nyléhn, J., & Ødegaard, M. (2018) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-018-0007-7 · Cited by 9
Gelman, S. A. (2011) · Human Development · doi:10.1159/000329139 · Cited by 9
Distorting the History of Evolutionary Thought in Conceptual Development Research
Kampourakis, K. (2014) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12198 · Cited by 9
The Psychology of Natural Kind TermsPreprint
Foster-Hanson, E., & Rhodes, M. (2019) · The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Reference · doi:10.31234/osf.io/a7sp4 · Cited by 8
How Accurate Are Students in Self‐Assessing Their Conceptions of Evolution?
Hartelt, T., & Martens, H. (2025) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21945 · Cited by 15
Noyes, A., Dunham, Y. C., Keil, F., & Ritchie, K. (2021) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101422 · Cited by 7
Same people, different group: Social structures are a central component of group concepts
Noyes, A., Keil, F. C., Dunham, Y. C., & Ritchie, K. (2023) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105567 · Cited by 8
Same, same but different! Exploring children’s understandings of within-species variation
Gormley, K., Birdsall, S. E., & France, B. (2022) · Journal of Biological Education · doi:10.1080/00219266.2022.2081244 · Cited by 8
Shahbazi, G., Samani, H., Mandalaywala, T. M., Borhani, K., & Davoodi, T. (2024) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0001616 · Cited by 7
Essential shape: The role of essentialist beliefs in preferences for misshapen produce
Gomez, P., Minton, E. A., & Spielmann, N. (2023) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2023.107119 · Cited by 7
Deterministic or probabilistic: U.S. children's beliefs about genetic inheritance
Menéndez, D., Donovan, A. M., Mathiaparanam, O. N., Seitz, V., Sabbagh, N. F., Klapper, R. E., Kalish, C. W., Rosengren, K. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2024) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.14053 · Cited by 10
Revising deference: Intuitive beliefs about category structure constrain expert deference
Noyes, A., & Keil, F. C. (2017) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2017.02.003 · Cited by 7
(2017) · OECD economic surveys. Austria · doi:10.1787/eco_surveys-aut-2017-graph59-en · Cited by 9
Shaping the Future of Biological Education Research
Korfiatis, K., Grace, M., & Hammann, M. (2023) · Contributions from biology education research · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-44792-1 · Cited by 6
What the Study of Psychological Essentialism May Reveal about the Natural World
Gelman, S. A. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190639679.003.0013 · Cited by 5
How origin stories shape children’s social reasoning
Foster‐Hanson, E., & Rhodes, M. (2020) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100962 · Cited by 7
Extensions of Sexual Strategies Theory across Peoples, Cultures, and Ecologies
Schmitt, D. P. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197536438.013.20 · Cited by 6
Cognitive Constraints Shape Public Debate on the Risks of Synthetic Biology
Swiney, L., Bates, D. G., & Coley, J. D. (2018) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.09.002 · Cited by 6
When Generic Language does not Promote Psychological Essentialism.
Vasilyeva, N. Y., Alison Gopnik, C., & Lombrozo, T. (2020) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 6
Premo, J., Cavagnetto, A. R., Honke, G., & Kurtz, K. J. (2018) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21466 · Cited by 6
Conflicting Views of Nature and Their Impact on Evolution Understanding
Shtulman, A. (2024) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-024-00568-2 · Cited by 5
Self-citationRelating ecological diversity to genetic discontinuity across bacterial species
Passarelli‐Araujo, H., Venâncio, T. M., & Hanage, W. P. (2025) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-024-03443-z · Cited by 5
Evolution Makes More Sense in the Light of Development
Kampourakis, K., & Minelli, A. (2014) · The American Biology Teacher · doi:10.1525/abt.2014.76.8.2 · Cited by 6
Royer, A. M., & Schultheis, E. H. (2014) · The American Biology Teacher · doi:10.1525/abt.2014.76.4.8 · Cited by 5
A System to Identify Young Children’s Reasoning About Variations Within Populations
Jégou, C., Gobert, J., Delserieys, A., & Ergazaki, M. I. (2022) · Contemporary trends and issues in science education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-08158-3_11 · Cited by 5
How Culture Shapes the Early Development of Essentialist Beliefs
Xu, Y., Wang, M., Moty, K., & Rhodes, M. (2024) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.13586 · Cited by 5
Essentialism in Biology: Contributions to Teaching
Pérez, G. (2024) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-024-00584-2 · Cited by 4
About birds and bees, snails and trees: Children's ideas on animal and plant evolution
Adler, I. K., Fiedler, D., & Harms, U. (2024) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21873 · Cited by 5
Children’s Use of Generic Labels, Discreteness, and Stability to Form a Novel Category
Peretz‐Lange, R., & Muentener, P. (2020) · Journal of Cognition and Development · doi:10.1080/15248372.2020.1757452 · Cited by 4
Dewey, J. L., Hicks, J., & Schuchardt, A. M. (2022) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.21-03-0062 · Cited by 3
Ha, M. (2016) · Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education · doi:10.14697/jkase.2016.36.6.0935 · Cited by 3
Essentialism, Vitalism, and the GMO Debate
Szántó, V. (2017) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-017-0276-0 · Cited by 3
Anthropic thinking about global climate change
Betz, N. (2019) · Digital Repository Service (Northeastern University) · doi:10.17760/d20318389 · Cited by 4
Nyléhn, J., Boge, C., Schaldach, P., & Soule, J. D. (2026) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-026-00721-z · Cited by 2
Learning Evolution by Collaboration
Shtulman, A., & Young, A. G. (2021) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biab089 · Cited by 2
Self-citationDefining evolution: exploring students’ conceptions of evolution in introductory biology courses
Hsu, J. L., Dorner, M. A., & Hill, K. M. (2024) · Evolution Education and Outreach · doi:10.1186/s12052-024-00208-x · Cited by 2
How Cultural Input Shapes the Development of Idealized Biological Prototypes
Foster‐Hanson, E., Ziska, K. M., & Rhodes, M. (2024) · Journal of Cognition and Development · doi:10.1080/15248372.2024.2409680 · Cited by 2
Gelman, S. A. (2025) · Advances in child development and behavior · doi:10.1016/bs.acdb.2025.06.001 · Cited by 2
Nuevos enfoques para comprender el desarrollo de los conceptos biológicos en niños pequeños
Ghazali-Mohammed, Z., & Tolmie, A. K. (2014) · Educatio Siglo XXI · doi:10.6018/j/202181 · Cited by 2
Stern, F., Kampourakis, K., Delaval, M., & Müller, A. (2021) · Contributions from biology education research · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86051-6_9 · Cited by 3
Heavy hearts and heads held high — A review of Glimpses of Creatures in Their Physical Worlds
DeScioli, P. (2010) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.12.002 · Cited by 2
A Field Guide for Teaching Evolution in the Social SciencesPreprint
Legare, C. H., Opfer, J. E., Busch, J. T. A., & Shtulman, A. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/yrw8z · Cited by 3
Self-citationThirteen Misunderstandings About Natural Selection
Al-Shawaf, L., Zreik, K., & Buss, D. (2021) · Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_2158 · Cited by 14
Cats, Bats, and People: Cultivating Children’s Understanding of Genes and Trait Inheritance
Combette, L. T., Emmons, N. A., Elster, E., & Kelemen, D. A. (2025) · Journal of Cognition and Development · doi:10.1080/15248372.2025.2541734 · Cited by 2
Cognitive and Socio-Cultural Development of Religious Belief in Children
Burdett, E. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009461924 · Cited by 1
What Is More Informative in the History of Science, the Signal or the Noise?
Shtulman, A. (2014) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12202 · Cited by 1
Self-citationThe Hidden Strengths of Weak Theories.
Keil, F. C. (2011) · PubMed · Cited by 1
류선희, Cha, H., & 구슬애 (2012) · BIOLOGY EDUCATION · doi:10.15717/bioedu.2012.40.4.395 · Cited by 1
The Comparative Analysis of Evolution Conceptions in Pre- and In-Service Biology Teachers
Ha, M. (2016) · BIOLOGY EDUCATION · doi:10.15717/bioedu.2016.44.2.277 · Cited by 1
Evolutiven Wandel verstehen: Der argumentative Kern
Gropengießer, H., & Zabel, J. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-69030-7_3 · Cited by 1
Dess, N. K. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738403.013.0026 · Cited by 1
Beniermann, A. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-69030-7_23 · Cited by 1
The Nature and Variability of Children's Alternative Conceptions of Evolution
Ly, U. (2011) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 1
FYTing with Science: Ideological Differences on the Nature and Origin of TruthPreprint
Stein, R., Swan, A. B., & Sarraf, M. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3326111 · Cited by 1
Développer l'esprit critique par la catégorisation multiple
Scheibling‐Sève, C. (2019) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/05ed011fz5164z41a0zaa07z3f978b0d37a1 · Cited by 1
Investigating how students communicate tree-thinking
Boyce, C. J. (2015) · Aquila Digital Community (University of Southern Mississippi) · Cited by 1
Sandell, M. (2010)
Opfer, J. E., Nehm, R. H., & Ha, M. (2012)
Student concepts of natural selection from a resource-based perspective
Benjamin, S. (2016) · OpenBU (Boston University)
An examination of the extent of adults' social essentialism
Eidson, R. C. (2014) · doi:10.17760/d20005094
Goff, K. D. (2017) · W&M Publish (College of William & Mary) · doi:10.21220/w43m27
Spier, S. K. (2019) · Lincoln (University of Nebraska)
Wait, But Why? Challenging the Intuitive Force of Substance Dualism
Ritchie, S. L. (2021) · Scientia et Fides · doi:10.12775/setf.2021.009
Seiter, K. M. (2020) · ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository (University of Louisville) · doi:10.18297/etd/3556
Development of Qualitative Thinking
Gelman, S. A. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108399838.019
The Cultural and Developmental Niche of Religious Cognitions
Richert, R. A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190693350.013.19
Getting to Darwin: Obstacles to Accepting Evolution by Natural Selection
(2012) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9218.003.0020
The species problem in evolution education
Manikas, M., LEONARDOS, I. D., Sotiropoulos, K., & Plakitsi, K. (2023) · Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher · doi:10.29333/mathsciteacher/13120 · Cited by 2
Baytelman, A., Loizou, T., & Chadjiconstantinou, S. (2023) · Contributions from biology education research · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-44792-1_9
Evolutionary Debunking and the Folk/Theoretical Distinction
Scarfone, M. (2024) · Philosophia · doi:10.1007/s11406-024-00725-5
Metadata
- Authors
- Shtulman, A., & Schulz, L.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shtulman, Andrew
- Venue
- Cognitive Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1049-1062
- ISSN
- 0364-0213 (ISSN-L)
- 1551-6709
- OpenAlex
- W2112404013
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 55.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cognitive Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- James S. McDonnell Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Keywords
- psychological essentialism, evolutionary reasoning, natural selection, intraspecific variation, species concept, misconceptions about evolution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review