The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Relation Between Essentialist Beliefs and Evolutionary Reasoning
Open accessAbstract
Historians of science have pointed to essentialist beliefs about species as major impediments to the discovery of natural selection. The present study investigated whether such beliefs are impediments to learning this concept as well. Participants (43 children aged 4-9 and 34 adults) were asked to judge the variability of various behavioral and anatomical properties across different members of the same species. Adults who accepted within-species variation-both actual and potential-were significantly more likely to demonstrate a selection-based understanding of evolution than adults who denied within-species variation. The latter demonstrated an alternative, incorrect understanding of evolution and produced response patterns that were both quantitatively and qualitatively similar to those produced by preschool-aged children. Overall, it is argued that psychological essentialism, although a useful bias for drawing species-wide inductions, leads individuals to devalue within-species variation and, consequently, to fail to understand natural selection.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, in spite of the obvious adaptive rationality of this cognitive predisposition, 83 psychological essentialism regularly interferes with a scientifically informed biological 84 understanding [27].”
From Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition (2015) · cites this paper as [27]
Citations
Cites
The growth of biological thought. Diversity, evolution, and inheritance
Farner, D. S. (1983) · The Auk · doi:10.1093/auk/100.2.507 · Cited by 2,503
The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance
Mayr, E. (1982) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 2,295
Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development
Keil, F. C. (1989) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2065.001.0001 · Cited by 1,886
Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-1926 · Cited by 1,822
Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development
Keil, F. C. (1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3559 · Cited by 1,699
Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics
Clement, J. (1982) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.12989 · Cited by 1,258
Gould, S. J. (1996) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674063396 · Cited by 998
Common sense concepts about motion
Halloun, I. A., & Hestenes, D. (1985) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.14031 · Cited by 852
Insides and essences: Early understandings of the non-obvious
Gelman, S. A., & Wellman, H. M. (1991) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(91)90007-q · Cited by 802
Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution
Bishop, B. A., & Anderson, C. (1990) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.3660270503 · Cited by 791
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–214 of 214
How Red Is a Ladybeetle? Examining People’s Notions of Biological VariabilityPreprint
León-Villagrá, P., Mathiaparanam, O. N., Rosengren, K. S., & Buchsbaum, D. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/8ckje
Adler, I. K., Fiedler, D., Shtulman, A., & Harms, U. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0331380
Self-citationCain, M. J. (2025) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-025-00787-8
Smith, E. I. (2011) · eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Grunspan, D. Z., Dunk, R. D. P., Barnes, M. E., Wiles, J. R., & Brownell, S. E. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14853108
Barnes, M. E., Aini, R. Q., Collins, J. P., Dunk, R. D. P., Holt, E. A., Jensen, J., Klein, J. R., Misheva, T., Nadelson, L. S., Reiss, M. J., et al. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26670525
Self-citationAdditional file 1 of Educational potential of teaching evolution as an interdisciplinary science
Hanisch, S., & Eirdosh, D. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13336438
Visualizing Racial Diversity in Anatomy Curricula Entrenches “Race” as a Biological Phenomenon
Jacobs, D. S. (2026) · Biomedical visualization · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-12305-3_3
Mental models on the material of the biological theory of evolution
Kurbanov, K. A., & Spiridonov, V. F. (2026) · Experimental Psychology (Russia) · doi:10.17759/exppsy.2026190105
How origin stories shape children’s social reasoningPreprint
Rhodes, M., & Foster‐Hanson, E. (2021) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Learning Progressions: A Novel Tool for Planning, Teaching and Assessing in Science Education
Gormley, K., Birdsall, S. E., & France, B. (2026) · New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.1007/s40841-026-00469-8
Steinseide, M. K., Henriksen, M. R., Gya, R., & Nyléhn, J. (2026) · Journal of Biological Education · doi:10.1080/00219266.2026.2719521
Burton, A. R., Davenport, E., Bissonnette, S. A., Tanner, K. D., & Coley, J. D. (2026) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.26-02-0035
Metadata
- Authors
- Shtulman, A., & Schulz, L.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shtulman, Andrew
- Venue
- Cognitive Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1049-1062
- ISSN
- 0364-0213 (ISSN-L)
- 1551-6709
- OpenAlex
- W2112404013
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 55.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cognitive Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- James S. McDonnell Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Keywords
- psychological essentialism, evolutionary reasoning, natural selection, intraspecific variation, species concept, misconceptions about evolution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
