Cited by 47Cryptographic Implementations and SecurityCryptography and Residue ArithmeticCoding theory and cryptography

Energy Efficient Lightweight Cryptography Algorithms for IoT Devices

Goyal, Tarun Kumar, Sahula, Vineet, Kumawat, Deepak·2022·IETE Journal of Research

Abstract

Over few decades, people have been working on providing security solutions, whereas attackers too have been working simultaneously. We present an evaluation of security algorithms, comparing performances and robustness. These comparisons are performed after hardware implementation and use crypt analysis. The targeted devices are wrist watches, RFID tags, IoT devices and others, which don't have a lot of areas (millions of gate equivalent). While performing this, the primary concern has been exploration of an algorithm that can work in these constrained limits. This led to a search for an algorithm that has low hardware footprints, low power consumption and better speed but at the same time implements adequate security. PRESENT has been found to be one such suitable algorithm. It has been also included in the new international standard for light-weight cryptographic methods under ISO/IEC 29192-2:2012 for its straight forward and light design. Our paper reports hardware implementation results of PRESENT, AES, ECDH, DH and RSA cryptography algorithms. We have implemented these algorithms with standard gate library of UMC-90 nm. Each algorithm has its own architecture and hence requires different crypt-analysis techniques like brute force, Pollard's Rho and biclique for “difficulty to break” measurement. It is a measure in term of time and data complexity of efforts required of a cryptographic attack. We have obtained 1.7× improvement in area and 63× improvement in power for modi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03772063.2019.1670103

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Energy-efficient cryptographic protocols such as the Energy-Efficient Lightweight Block Cipher demonstrate reduced energy consumption without compromising security.

    “Protocols such as the Energy-Efficient Lightweight Block Cipher demonstrate reduced energy consumption without compromising security [76,78].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goyal, T. K., Sahula, V., & Kumawat, D.
Affiliations
Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur (IN)
Venue
IETE Journal of Research
Published
2019-11-07
Volume
68
Issue
3
Pages
1722-1735
ISSN
  • 0377-2063 (ISSN-L)
  • 0974-780X
OpenAlex
W2985143708
Cited by
47
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IETE Journal of Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Coding theory and cryptography
Keywords
lightweight cryptography, PRESENT block cipher, Internet of Things security, hardware implementation, power consumption, area efficiency, cryptanalysis, brute force attacks, AES, elliptic curve Diffie-Hellman, Diffie-Hellman, RFID tags, wristwatches, 90 nm CMOS

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review