Cited by 43Cryptographic Implementations and SecurityCoding theory and cryptographyCryptography and Residue Arithmetic

Improving the Biclique Cryptanalysis of AES

Tao, Biaoshuai, Wu, Hongjun·2015·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-19962-7_3

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bogdanov, A., Kavun, E., Paar, C., Rechberger, C., Yalcin, T.: Better than brute-force–optimized hardware architecture for efficient biclique attacks on AES-128. In: ECRYPT Workshop, SHARCS-Special Purpose Hardware for Attacking Cryptographic Systems (2012)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tao, B., & Wu, H.
Affiliations
Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Corresponding author
  • Tao, Biaoshuai
  • Wu, Hongjun
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2015
Pages
39-56
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W972261331
Cited by
43
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.44
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Coding theory and cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Keywords
AES, key recovery attack, block cipher cryptanalysis, differential characteristics, time complexity, data complexity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review