Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 407

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

NUTRIENTS AND THE PRODUCTIVITY OF ESTUARINE AND COASTAL MARINE ECOSYSTEMS

Open access
Nixon, S. W., Oviatt, C. A., Frithsen, J., Sullivan, B.·1986·Journal of the Limnological Society of Southern Africa

Abstract

SUMMARY Recent research on estuarine and coastal marine systems has revealed two particularly interesting things about nutrients and productivity. First is the observation that these areas are among the most intensively fertilized environments on earth. Second is the common finding that much of the characteristically high primary productivity of these shallow waters is supported by nutrients released or recycled by pelagic and benthic microheterotrophs. Since nutrient inputs to coastal areas have probably been increasing and are likely to continue to do so, it is particularly important to understand the relationship between nutrient loading and nutrient cycling and the extent to which their interactions may set the levels of primary and secondary production in coastal systems. That some direct relationship exists between the input of nutrients and the productivity of higher trophic levels has been a principle of marine ecology since the turn of the century. It is surprisingly difficult, however, to find quantitative evidence showing that estuaries, lagoons, or other coastal waters respond to eutrophication by producing a larger biomass of animals. Part of this difficulty arises because the amount of nitrogen or phosphorus incorporated in animal tissue is a very small term in the total nutrient budget of an estuary, and the accuracy and precision of ecological field measurements may not be adequate to the task. In addition, the response of natural systems to nutrient enrichment is compounded by changes in climate, hydrography, harvesting effort and technology, and pollution. Attempts to avoid some of these problems by carrying out controlled nutrient addition experiments in the field or with mesocosms have been much rarer in marine ecology than in limnology. The results that are available for such studies seem to suggest that there is a modest enhancement of primary production with nutrient addition, but that most of this extra organic matter is rapidly consumed, presumably by microheterotrophs. In other words, as nutrient inputs rise, so does the rate of nutrient recycling. Only a small fraction of the added nutrients appears as an increment in the production of higher trophic levels.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03779688.1986.9639398

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 407

Metadata

Authors
Nixon, S. W., Oviatt, C. A., Frithsen, J., & Sullivan, B.
Venue
Journal of the Limnological Society of Southern Africa
Published
1986-01
Volume
12
Issue
1-2
Pages
43-71
ISSN
0377-9688 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062207631
Cited by
407
References
0
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NUTRIENTS AND THE PRODUCTIVITY OF ESTUARINE AND COASTAL MARINE ECOSYSTEMS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03779688.1986.9639398
The paper
Nixon, S. W., Oviatt, C. A., Frithsen, J., & Sullivan, B. (1986). NUTRIENTS AND THE PRODUCTIVITY OF ESTUARINE AND COASTAL MARINE ECOSYSTEMS. Journal of the Limnological Society of Southern Africa. https://doi.org/10.1080/03779688.1986.9639398

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.