Cited by 223Marine and coastal ecosystemsMarine Biology and Ecology ResearchPhysiological and biochemical adaptations

Effects of low oxygen waters on Chesapeake Bay zooplankton

Roman, Michael R., Gauzens, Anne L., Rhinehart, W. Kirk, White, Jacques R.·1993·Limnology and Oceanography

Abstract

The bottom waters of the mesohaline portion of Chesapeake Bay become depleted in oxygen in summer. We found that copepods and nauplii were in low abundance or absent from bottom waters when oxygen concentrations were <1 mg O 2 liter−1. In contrast, when oxygen concentrations were higher in bottom waters in spring or summer due to episodic mixing events, the highest copepod abundances were often found in bottom waters. Laboratory experiments confirmed that oxygen concentrations <1 mg O 2 liter−1 resulted in reduced survival of the copepods Acartia tonsa and Oithona colcarva and inhibited the hatching of A. tonsa eggs. The decrease in Chesapeake Bay copepods in May–June parallels the decline of oxygen in bottom waters. Our field and laboratory data suggest that this decline in copepods could result from reduced recruitment as a consequence of egg mortality in the low‐oxygen bottom waters. In summer this source of mortality would be reduced because warmer water temperatures would allow the eggs to hatch in the upper water column above the low‐oxygen bottom waters.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4319/lo.1993.38.8.1603

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Within Chesapeake Bay, the effects of hypoxia on distribution and abundance of zooplankton and fish larvae have been demonstrated in several locations.

    “Within Chesapeake Bay, the effects of hypoxia on distribution and abundance of zooplankton and fish larvae have been demonstrated in several locations (Roman et al. 1993, Keister et al. 2000, Ludsin et al. 2009).”

    From Patterns and drivers of the demersal fish community of Chesapeake Bay (2013) · cites this paper as Roman et al. 1993

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roman, M. R., Gauzens, A. L., Rhinehart, W. K., & White, J. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (US)
  • Louisiana State University (US)
Venue
Limnology and Oceanography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-12
Volume
38
Issue
8
Pages
1603-1614
ISSN
  • 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5590
OpenAlex
W2154231925
Cited by
223
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Limnology and Oceanography (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Biology and Ecology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
Keywords
hypoxia, low-oxygen waters, Chesapeake Bay, zooplankton, copepods, Acartia tonsa, nauplii, copepod survival, egg hatching, egg mortality, copepod recruitment, summer stratification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review