The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Cycle of Sedimentation and Erosion in Urban River Channels
Abstract
Historical evidence and contemporary measurements indicate in the Piedmont of Maryland that successive changes in land use have been accompanied by changes in sediment yield and in the behavior of river channels. Sediment yields from forested areas in the pre-farming era appear to have been less than 100 tons/sq.mi/year. Yields from agricultural lands in the same region at a later time range from 300 to 800 t/sq.mi. on large drainage areas. Subsequently, on lands marginal to expanding urban centers, a decline in active farming may be accompanied by a decline in sediment yield. In marked contrast, areas exposed during construction can produce sediment loads in excess of 100,000 t/sq.mi./ year. Small channel systems become clogged with sand during this construction period. While sediment deposited in channels during construction is gradually removed by subsequent clearer flows, rates of removal are slow and hampered by deposition of debris. Increased runoff from urban areas coupled with a decline in sediment yields to values on the order of 50 to 100 t/sq.mi. promote continued bank erosion and channel widening. Maximum observed rates of bank erosion were on the order of 1.0 foot per year. Raw banks adjacent to coarse cobble bars and widespread deposits of flotsam and debris attest to the flood regimen of urban rivers. Canalization in concrete does not eliminate such debris nor does it eliminate deposition of sediment as local changes in gradient, excessive channel width, and debris accumulation foster deposition even in canalized reaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Streams in the Urban Landscape
Paul, M. J., & Meyer, J. L. (2001) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114040 · Cited by 2,795
The Effects of Urban Patterns on Ecosystem Function
Alberti, M. (2005) · International Regional Science Review · doi:10.1177/0160017605275160 · Cited by 1,020
Natural Streams and the Legacy of Water-Powered Mills
Walter, R. C., & Merritts, D. J. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1151716 · Cited by 890
Restoring streams in an urbanizing world
BERNHARDT, E. S., & PALMER, M. A. (2007) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01718.x · Cited by 525
Sediment diffusion during overbank flows
PIZZUTO, J. E. (1987) · Sedimentology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3091.1987.tb00779.x · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolman, M. G.
- Venue
- Geografiska Annaler: Series A, Physical Geography
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1967-08
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2-4
- Pages
- 385-395
- ISSN
- 0435-3676 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0459
- OpenAlex
- W2005324769
- Cited by
- 673
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Cycle of Sedimentation and Erosion in Urban River Channels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/04353676.1967.11879766
- The paper
- Wolman, M. G. (1967). A Cycle of Sedimentation and Erosion in Urban River Channels. Geografiska Annaler: Series A, Physical Geography. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353676.1967.11879766
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.