The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using group projects as a strategy to increase cooperation among low- and high-achieving students
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the perceptions, interactions and behaviours of different-ability college students when they worked on different types of assessments. Two classes of 145 Vietnamese college students participated in this three-month study. The students were assigned to mixed-ability groups, each of which consisted of five students. The results show that assessment designed as a group project helped close the gap in communication and interactions between different-ability students within groups. When the students engaged with assessment as a group project, all levels of performers increased productive learning behaviours and provided more relevant verbal help and assistance to each other. Importantly, this type of assessment created various opportunities for the low performers to participate in, and make a contribution to, group tasks. As a result, all group members became interested in working with others. They perceived cooperative learning groups as being enjoyable and fun.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Juxtaposed with their concerns about losing the individual self, Vietnamese students do not express any interests in giving peer comments or carrying out peer assessment if they are aware that their honesty in evaluation and feedback provision might hurt their friends or wreck the friendship (Nguyen, 2008; Thanh Pham, 2013).”
From Electronic Peer Feedback, EFL Academic Writing and Reflective Thinking: Evidence From a Confucian Context (2020) · cites this paper as Thanh Pham, 2013
Citations
Cites
Cooperative Learning Returns To College What Evidence Is There That It Works?
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998) · Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning · doi:10.1080/00091389809602629 · Cited by 1,011
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- Allan, S.D. (1991). Ability grouping research reviews: What do they say about grouping and the gifted? Educational Leadership, 48(6), 60–65.
- 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01038.x · DOI
- Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. London: Longman.
- 10.3102/00346543064001001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/03075077912331377131 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.137 · DOI
- 10.1163/9789460910562 · DOI
- 10.1016/0959-4752(96)00002-3 · DOI
- Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, J. (2005). Cultures and organization-software of the minds (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
- 10.2190/T26C-3FTH-RNYP-TV30 · DOI
- Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1990). Cooperative learning and achievement. In SharanS. (Ed.), Cooperative learning: Theory and research, (pp. 173–202). New York: Praeger.
- 10.2307/2943877 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF03025835 · DOI
- Luu, T.T. (2010). Infusing cooperative learning into an EFL classroom. English Language Teaching, 3(2), 64–75.
- Messier, P.W. (2005). Traditional teaching strategies versus cooperative teaching strategies: Which can improve achievement scores in Chinese middle schools?. US-China Education Review, 2(1), 1–10.
- 10.1080/00220671.1994.9941255 · DOI
- Patton, M.Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in education. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Phuong-Mai, N. (2008). Culture and cooperation: Cooperative learning in Asian Confucian heritage cultures – The case of Viet Nam. Utrecht, the Netherlands: IVLOS Institute of Education of Utrecht University.
- Robinson, G.E. (1990). Synthesis of research on class size. Educational Leadership, 47(7), 80–90.
- 10.1177/0193841X8500900505 · DOI
- 10.1006/ceps.1996.0004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.07.001 · DOI
- Thanh-Pham, T.H., Gillies, R.M., & Renshaw, P. (2011). Designing strategies to make cooperative learning culturally appropriate in the Vietnamese context. Higher Education Review, 44(1), 43–57.
- Vedder, P. (1985). Cooperative learning: A study on process and effects of cooperation between primary school children. The Netherlands: Groningen: University of Groningen.
- Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Webb, N. (1985). Student interaction and learning in small groups: A research summery. In SlavinR.SharanS.KaganS. (Ed.), Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn, (pp. 5–15). New York: Plenum.
- 10.3102/00346543052003421 · DOI
Cited by
Pham, T. N., Lin, M., Trinh, V. Q., & Bui, L. T. P. (2020) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244020914554 · Cited by 68
“…about losing the individual self, Vietnamese students do not express any interests in giving peer comments or carrying out peer assessment if they are aware that their honesty in evaluation and feedback provision might hurt their friends or wreck the friendship (Nguyen, 2008; Thanh Pham, 2013).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Thanh Pham, T. H.
- Affiliations
- ,
- Venue
- Higher Education Research & Development
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-08-27
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 993-1006
- ISSN
- 0729-4360
- 1469-8366
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using group projects as a strategy to increase cooperation among low- and high-achieving students. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07294360.2013.806436
- The paper
- Thanh Pham, T. H. (2013). Using group projects as a strategy to increase cooperation among low- and high-achieving students. Higher Education Research & Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.806436
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.