Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 79Higher Education and EmployabilityTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesTeacher Professional Development and Motivation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The WIL to learn: students’ perspectives on the impact of work-integrated learning placements on their professional readiness

Open access
Aprile, Kerry Therese, Knight, Bruce Allen·2020·Higher Education Research & Development

Abstract

Work-integrated learning (WIL) has assumed life as a central feature of higher education curriculum design in a wide range of disciplines with the ultimate goal of producing work-ready graduates. Under recent Australian government initiatives affecting teacher education, placement forms of WIL have been touted as the panacea for perceived problems with graduate teacher quality; resulting in the national regulation of placement design and length in this discipline. This article reports the findings of a qualitative study into the perspectives of fifteen teacher education students from one regional Australian university. The study investigated these students’ placement experiences and the impact of these experiences on their perceptions of readiness for a career in the teaching profession. Thematic analysis is the method used to identify two key themes in the data collected through semi-structured interviews. Despite recognising the benefits of real-world opportunities for skill development and practice inherent in WIL placement experiences, the study highlights important limitations of these forms of WIL on the development of professional readiness arising from the contextual features of particular placement sites; relationships with workplace supervisors and performance pressure associated with assessment during placements. These findings not only confirm the importance of social processes in the preparation of work-ready graduates but question reliance on placement forms of…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07294360.2019.1695754

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Bahr N., 2016, Australian education review, 61
  2. 10.1007/978-94-017-7230-3 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/978-1-4020-8905-3_3 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Brenner M., 2006, Handbook of complementary methods in education research, 357
  5. Bullock S.M., 2010, Field experiences in the context of reform of Canadian teacher education programs, 91
  6. 10.1080/10476210.2012.711815 · DOI
  7. Commonwealth of Australia, 2018, Through growth to achievement: Report of the review to achieve educational excellence in Australian schools
  8. 10.4324/9780203854501 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/0729436042000206636 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/0022487105285962 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Groundwater-Smith S., 2015, Teaching challenges and dilemmas
  12. 10.14742/ajet.1701 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1108/09534811011017180 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/03075079.2013.842221 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1080/02602930902977731 · DOI
  16. Kaider F., 2017, Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 18, 153
  17. 10.1177/0022487105285639 · DOI
  18. Kolb D., 1984, Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development
  19. Kramer M., 2011, Work-integrated learning and career-ready students: Examining the evidence
  20. Le Cornu R., 2015, Key components of effective professional experience in initial teacher education in Australia
  21. Liamputtong P., 2005, Qualitative research methods
  22. McLachlan K., 2017, Research and development in higher education: Curriculum transformation, 40, 241
  23. 10.1080/02602938.2011.618878 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/978-981-10-4075-7_43 · DOI
  25. Patrick C., 2008, The WIL [work integrated learning] report: A national scoping study [Australian learning and teaching council (ALTC) final report]
  26. Patterson V., 1999, Journal of Career Planning and Employment, 57, 30
  27. Rowe A., 2017, Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 18, 87
  28. Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group [TEMAG], 2014, Action now: Classroom ready teachers
  29. Trede F., 2012, Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 13, 159
  30. 10.1007/978-3-319-32958-1_1 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Aprile, K. T., & Knight, B. A.
Affiliations
Central Queensland University (AU)
Corresponding author
Aprile, Kerry Therese
Venue
Higher Education Research & Development
Published
2019-12-01
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
869-882
ISSN
  • 0729-4360 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8366
OpenAlex
W2992231680
Cited by
79
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2
FWCI
12.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Higher Education Research & Development (publishedVersion)
  • Acquire (CQUniversity) (submittedVersion)
  • Cross Connect (Southern Cross University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
Keywords
work-integrated learning, teacher professional development, student placement, professional readiness, graduate employability, student perceptions, placement supervisors, assessment pressure, teacher quality, higher education curriculum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.