Cited by 727Online and Blended LearningProblem and Project Based LearningInnovative Education and Learning Practices

Patterns of engagement in authentic online learning environments

Open access
Herrington, Jan, Oliver, Ron, Reeves, Thomas C.·2003·Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

Abstract

The use of authentic activities within online learning environments has been shown to have many benefits for learners in online units and courses. There has been renewed interest in the role of student activities within course units, as constructivist philosophy and advances in technology impact on educational design and practice. Courses based on these principles have been used successfully across a wide variety of discipline areas. In spite of the growing evidence of the success of authentic learning environments, they are not without their problems. In this paper we discuss patterns of engagement that have emerged from our own research on authentic learning tasks, in particular, the initial reluctance to willingly immerse in learning scenarios that some students experience, and the need for the suspension of disbelief before engaging in the task. The paper proposes ten characteristics of authentic activities, based on educational theory and research, which have been used as criteria for the selection of existing online units or courses for in depth investigation. The paper includes a short review of the literature, a description of the research and some preliminary findings and identification of issues related to the necessity for students to willingly suspend disbelief in order to fully engage in learning scenarios based on authentic tasks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14742/ajet.1701

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Benefits of blended learning include the possibility to develop more meaningful activities because of the location within the site of professional practice.

    “The benefits of blended learning therefore also include the possibility to develop more meaningful activities (Herrington et al., 2003) because of the location within the site of their professional practice.”

    From Using personalized support & school-based study groups to increase teachers’ participation in MOOCs: Findings from two European pilot projects (2021) · cites this paper as Herrington et al., 2003

    The ‘Authentic activities in learning environments’ section says that realistic, context-rich online tasks benefit learners, supporting the point that such activities can be more meaningful than decontextualised exercises. It does not establish this as a benefit of blended learning or attribute it to learners being located at a site of professional practice; the paper describes online environments that resemble real-world contexts. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Barab, S.A., Squire, K.D., & Dueber, W. (2000). A co-evolutionary model for supporting the emergence of authenticity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 37-62.
  2. Bennett, S., Harper, B., & Hedberg, J. (2001). Designing real-life cases to support authentic design activities. In G. Kennedy, M. Keppell, C. McNaught , & T. Petrovic (Eds.), Meeting at the Crossroads. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 73-81). Melbourne: Biomedical Multimedia Unit, University of Melbourne. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne01/pdf/papers/bennetts.pdf
  3. Bransford, J.D., Vye, N., Kinzer, C., & Risko, V. (1990). Teaching thinking and content knowledge: Toward an integrated approach. In B.F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 381-413). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  4. Bullen, F. & Karri, V. (2002). Design and construction of a Formula SAE racecar in a teaching and research framework. In A. Goody, J. Herrington & M. Northcote (Eds), Quality conversations: Research and Development in Higher Education, Volume 25 (pp. 74-82). Jamison, ACT: HERDSA. [verified 6 Feb 2003] http://www.ecu.edu.au/conferences/herdsa/papers/ref/pdf/Bullen.pdf
  5. Challis, D. (2002). Integrating the conceptual and practice worlds: A case study from architecture. In A. Goody, J. Herrington & M. Northcote (Eds), Quality conversations: Research and Development in Higher Education, Volume 25 (pp. 106- 113). Jamison, ACT: HERDSA. [verified 6 Feb 2003] http://www.ecu.edu.au/conferences/herdsa/papers/ref/pdf/Challis.pdf Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990). Technology and the design of generative learning environments. Educational Technology, 31(5), 34-40.
  6. Hunt, L., Kershaw, L., & Seddon, J. (2002). Authentic transitions: The Click Around ECU online transition to university program. In A. Goody, J. Herrington & M. Northcote (Eds), Quality conversations: Research and Development in Higher Education, Volume 25 (pp. 338-353). Jamison, ACT: HERDSA. [verified 6 Feb 2003] http://www.ecu.edu.au/conferences/herdsa/papers/ref/pdf/Hunt.pdf
  7. Jonassen, D. (1991). Evaluating constructivistic learning. Educational Technology, 31(9), 28-33.
  8. Kantor, R.J., Waddington, T., & Osgood, R.E. (2000). Fostering the suspension of disbelief: The role of authenticity in goal-based scenarios. Interactive Learning Environments, 8(3), 211-227.
  9. Laurel, B. (1993). Computers as theatre. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  10. Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  11. Marshall, L., Northcote, M., & Lenoy, M. (2001). Design influences in the creation of an online mathematics unit for indigenous adults. In G. Kennedy, M. Keppell, C. McNaught , & T. Petrovic (Eds.), Meeting at the Crossroads. Short Paper Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 113-116). Melbourne: Biomedical Multimedia Unit, University of Melbourne. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne01/pdf/papers/marshalll.pdf
  12. O'Reilly, M. (2000). Reinvigorating educational design for an online world. In R. Sims, M. O'Reilly , & S. Sawkins (Eds.), Learning to choose: Choosing to Learn: Proceedings of the 17th Annual ASCILITE Conference (pp. 255-264). Lismore, NSW: Southern Cross University Press. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/coffs00/papers/meg_oreilly.pdf
  13. Petraglia, J. (1998a). The real world on a short leash: The (mis)application of constructivism to the design of educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(3), 53-65.
  14. Reeves, T.C., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2002). Authentic activities and online learning. In A. Goody, J. Herrington , & M. Northcote (Eds.), Quality conversations: Research and Development in Higher Education, Volume 25 (pp. 562- 567). Jamison, ACT: HERDSA. [verified 6 Feb 2003] http://www.ecu.edu.au/conferences/herdsa/papers/ref/pdf/Reeves.pdf
  15. Rice, M., Owies, D., Campbell, A., Snow, R., Owen, N., & Holt, D. (1999). V-Lab: A virtual laboratory for teaching introductory concepts and methods of physical fitness and function. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 15(2), 188-206. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet15/rice.html
  16. Taplin, M. (2000). Problem-based learning in distance education: Practitioners' beliefs about an action learning project. Distance Education, 21(2), 284-307.
  17. Young, M.F. (1993). Instructional design for situated learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(1), 43-58.

Cited by

Authors
Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Reeves, T. C.
Affiliations
  • Edith Cowan University (AU)
  • University of Georgia (US)
Venue
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
Published
2003-03-17
Volume
19
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1449-3098 (ISSN-L)
  • 1449-5554
OpenAlex
W1927291718
Cited by
727
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 47
FWCI
136.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Australasian Journal of Educational Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • US-UK Fulbright Commission
  • Fulbright Australia
  • Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
Keywords
authentic learning tasks, student engagement, virtual learning environments, suspension of disbelief, learning scenarios, constructivism, online course design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review