The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Learning for an unknown future
Abstract
What is it to learn for an unknown future? It might be said that the future has always been unknown but our opening question surely takes on a new pedagogical challenge if not urgency in the contem...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reframing Professional Development Through Understanding Authentic Professional Learning
Webster-Wright, A. (2009) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654308330970 · Cited by 1,174
Educational Leadership: Cultivating Leadership Qualities Generates Student Leaders
Grigoropoulos, J. E. (2021) · Advances in Mobile and Distance Learning · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-7760-8.ch009 · Cited by 939
Theorising student engagement in higher education
Kahn, P. E. (2014) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.3121 · Cited by 197
Australian teacher education: inside-out, outside-in, backwards and forwards?
Ling, L. M. (2017) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2017.1385599 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Barnett *, R.
- Venue
- Higher Education Research & Development
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 247-260
- ISSN
- 0729-4360 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8366
- OpenAlex
- W4249395625
- Cited by
- 491
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning for an unknown future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0729436042000235382
- The paper
- Barnett *, R. (2004). Learning for an unknown future. Higher Education Research & Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436042000235382
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.