CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 268Academic integrity and plagiarismPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesDoctoral Education Challenges and Solutions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In their own words: a qualitative study of the reasons Australian university students plagiarize

Devlin, Marcia, Gray, Kathleen·2007·Higher Education Research & Development
DOI 10.1080/07294360701310805
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The ways in which universities and individual academics attempt to deter and respond to student plagiarism may be based on untested assumptions about particular or primary reasons for this behaviour. Using a series of group interviews, this qualitative study gathered the views of 56 Australian university students on the possible reasons for plagiarism within their institution. The results indicate a wide and disparate range of possible contributing reasons for plagiarism, including: institutional admission criteria; student understanding of plagiarism; poor academic skills; a range of teaching and learning factors; personality factors; and external pressures. These findings are compared with other findings about reasons for student plagiarism in Australasia. The implications of these findings are considered for universities and individual academics seeking to better engage with their students to minimize or marginalize plagiarism.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07294360701310805

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Allan , G. , Callagher , L. , Connors , M. , Joyce , D. and Rees , M. Policies, technology and processes for promoting academic integrity: Some Australasian perspectives on academic integrity in the Internet age . Paper presented at the Educause Australasia Conference . Auckland, New Zealand. April . Retrieved May 1, 2006 from http://www.turnitin.com/static/pdf/paperabstract.pdf
  2. Devlin , M. 2003a . The problem with plagiarism . Campus Review , 12 : 4 – 5 .
  3. 10.1023/A:1026569608656 · DOI
  4. 10.1080/00091380109601795 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Marshall , S. and Garry , M. 2005 . “ How well do students really understand plagiarism? ” . In Balance, fidelity, mobility: Proceedings of the 2005 ASCILITE Conference , Edited by: Goss , H. Brisbane : Queensland University of Technology . Retrieved May 1, 2006 from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/brisbane05/blogs/proceedings/52_Marshall.pdf
  6. Noah , H. and Eckstein , M. 2001 . Fraud and education: The worm in the apple , Lanham, MD : Rowman & Littlefield .
  7. Thompson , C. 2005 . ‘Authority is everything’: A study of the politics of textual ownership and knowledge in the formation of student writer identities . International Journal for Educational Integrity , 1 (1) Retrieved May 1, 2006 from http://www.ojs.unisa.edu.au/journals/index.php/IJEI/article/viewFile/18/8 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 268

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Devlin, M., & Gray, K.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Devlin, Marcia
ORCID
Venue
Higher Education Research & Development
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2007-06
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
181-198
ISSN
  • 0729-4360 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8366
DOI
10.1080/07294360701310805
OpenAlex
W2095327754
Cited by
268
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
20.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Higher Education Research & Development (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
Keywords
student plagiarism, reasons for plagiarism, university students, academic integrity, academic skills, personality factors, external pressure, anti-plagiarism policies, student engagement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review