Effects of docosahexaenoic acid on serum lipoproteins in patients with combined hyperlipidemia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of daily dietary supplementation with 1.25 g or 2.5 g of docosahexaenoic (DHA), in the absence of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), on serum lipids and lipoproteins in persons with combined hyperlipidemia (CHL) [serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) 130 to 220 mg/dL and triglycerides 150 to 400 mg/dL]. METHODS: After a 6-week dietary stabilization period, subjects entered a 4-week single-blind placebo (vegetable oil) run-in phase. Those with adequate compliance during the the run-in were randomized into one of three parallel groups (placebo, 1.25, or 2.5 g/day DHA) for 6 weeks of treatment. Supplements were administered in a triglyceride form contained in gelatin capsules. Primary outcome measurements were plasma phospholipid DHA content, serum triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). LDL-C and non-HDL-C. RESULTS: The DHA content of plasma phospholipids increased dramatically (2 to 3 fold) in a dose-dependent manner. Significant (p < 0.05) changes were observed in serum triglycerides (17 to 21% reduction) and HDL-C (6% increase) which were of similar magnitude in both DHA groups. Non-HDL-C [+1.6 (NS) and +5.7% (p < 0.04)] and LDL-C [+9.3% (NS) and +13.6% (p < 0.001)] increased in the DHA treatment groups. All lipid effects reached an apparent steady state within the first 3 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSION: Dietary DHA, in the absence of EPA, can affect lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels in patients with combined hyperlipidemia. The desirable triglyceride and HDL-C changes were present at a dose which did not significantly increased non-HDL-C or LDL-C. These preliminary findings suggest that dietary supplementation with 1.25 g DHA/day, provided in a triglyceride form, may be an effective tool to aid in the management of hypertriglyceridemia.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The greatest decrease in TG and greatest increase in LDL-C appeared in the two studies that included participants with elevated serum lipid concentrations at baseline.
“The greatest decrease in TG and greatest increase in LDL-C appeared in the two studies that included participants with elevated serum lipid concentrations at baseline (23,29).”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 13 · Cited by 68
- Authors
- Davidson, M. H., Maki, K. C., Kalkowski, J., Schaefer, E. J., Torri, S. A., & Drennan, K. B.
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 236-243
- ISSN
- 0731-5724 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-1087
- OpenAlex
- W2037276581
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American College of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
- Keywords
- docosahexaenoic acid, mixed dyslipidemia, hypertriglyceridemia, dietary supplementation, omega-3 fatty acids, serum lipoproteins, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, serum triglycerides, dose-response relationship
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Oral, Aged, Biological Availability, Cholesterol, Diet, Docosahexaenoic Acids, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hyperlipidemias, Male, Middle Aged, Phospholipids, Triglycerides
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review