The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Functional Food Trend: What’s Next And What Americans Think About Eggs
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Health Focus National Study of Public Attitudes and Actions Toward Healthy Foods is conducted every two years to identify current issues in consumer health and nutrition behavior and attitudes, to assess the trends in consumer priorities and to develop an understanding of where consumers are headed in their behavior towards their health and diet. This paper focuses on consumer interests in functional nutrition for disease prevention and health enhancement. It examines the role consumers see for eggs in healthy diets. METHODS: The data for this study were collected from written questionnaires completed by 2,074 qualified respondents in August, September and October of 1998. The research was conducted in two stages: 1. A telephone pre-recruit from a national probability sample of households qualified respondents as Primary Grocery Shoppers (those who make most of the food buying decisions for their household or who equally share that responsibility). 2. A 12-page, self-administered questionnaire was mailed to qualified respondents. Respondents to this survey represent shoppers in the U.S. in all respects except race. Women account for 81% of the survey respondents, since they do most of the household shopping. RESULTS: Most shoppers believe foods can offer benefits that reach beyond basic nutrition to functional nutrition for disease prevention and health enhancement. As consumers better understand the functional benefits of eggs, from Prevention to Performance, Wellness, Nurturing and Cosmetics, eggs will continue to play an important role in healthy eating for many consumers. CONCLUSIONS: Eggs are considered a healthy food by most consumers as long as they are eaten in moderation. Increased egg consumption is being driven by consumer interest in health benefits that reach beyond dietary avoidance strategies to positive nutrition strategies. Today's self-reliant approach to health creates significant opportunities for health and nutrition marketers to use knowledge-based marketing programs to shape present and future health decisions and product choices among shoppers.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The influence of demographic variables on attitudes toward and consumption of functional foods has been reported in several articles [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34].”
From The association of demographic characteristics and food choice motives with the consumption of functional foods in emerging adults (2020) · cites this paper as [34]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Functional food. Product development, marketing and consumer acceptance—a review
Siró, I., Kápolna, E., Kápolna, B., & Lugasi, A. (2008) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2008.05.060 · Cited by 1,758
“In the same study, it was shown that perceptions of taste and enjoyment of healthy foods have declined (Gilbert, 2000).”
InfluentialConsumer acceptance of functional foods: Socio-demographic, cognitive and attitudinal determinants
Verbeke, W. (2005) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.01.001 · Cited by 839
Functional foods: Consumer willingness to compromise on taste for health?
Verbeke, W. (2005) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.03.003 · Cited by 642
“Also in the specific case of functional foods, taste expectations and experiences have been reported as extremely critical factors when selecting this food category (Childs & Poryzees, 1997; Gilbert, 2000; Poulsen, 1999; Tuorila & Cardello, 2002).”
BackgroundIndividual determinants of fish consumption: application of the theory of planned behaviour
Verbeke, W., & Vackier, I. (2004) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2004.08.006 · Cited by 628
Consumer perception and choice of minimally processed vegetables and packaged fruits
Ragaert, P., Verbeke, W., Devlieghere, F., et al. (2003) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/s0950-3293(03)00066-1 · Cited by 465
Metadata
- Authors
- Gilbert, L. C.
- Affiliations
- Iowa Department of Transportation (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gilbert, Linda C.
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-10
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- sup5
- Pages
- 507S-512S
- ISSN
- 0731-5724 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-1087
- OpenAlex
- W2025105030
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American College of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
- Keywords
- functional foods, eggs, consumer attitudes, disease prevention, health improvement, healthy eating, nutrition marketing, food purchasing decisions
- MeSH terms
- Educational Status, Eggs, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Mass Media, Surveys and Questionnaires, Taste, United States, Food, Organic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review