Cited by 58Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorMuscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and Training

Nutritional Intake and Energy Availability of Collegiate Distance Runners

Beermann, Brooke L., Lee, Deborah G., Almstedt, Hawley C., McCormack, William P.·2020·Journal of the American College of Nutrition

Abstract

Objective: Research investigating the dietary habits of distance runners has presented varying results. Proper dietary intake appears to enhance distance running performance and low dietary intake may impact health. The purpose of this investigation was to perform a comprehensive evaluation of nutrient intake of collegiate distance runners with comparison to recommendations for athletes. Methods: Twenty-one men (Age: 19.6 ± 1.2 years; height: 177.1 ± 5.7 cm; body mass: 65.7 ± 4.6 kg; body fat: 15.5 ± 2.2%) and 20 women (Age: 20.2 ± 1.7 years; height: 162.9 ± 6.6 cm; body mass: 53.7 ± 6.5 kg; body fat: 23.3 ± 3.6%) volunteered to participate in the investigation. Energy intake was derived from the Block Food Frequency Questionnaire. Energy availability was calculated by subtracting exercising energy expenditure from daily energy intake, divided by bone free lean mass and fat-free mass. Macronutrient and micronutrient consumption were compared with the appropriate dietary reference intake values, U.S. Dietary Guidelines, or standards recommended for endurance athletes. Results: Dietary intake for the men was 2,741.0 ± 815.2kilocalories and for the women was 1,927.7 ± 638.2kilocalories. A majority of the runners (73%) consumed less than recommended levels of carbohydrates. All men and 75% of women met or exceeded the recommended daily protein intake. Fifty percent of women and 24% of men did not meet the recommended daily allowance for calcium. Ninety-five percent of the runners…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07315724.2020.1735570

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 69 · Cited by 58

Authors
Beermann, B. L., Lee, D. G., Almstedt, H. C., & McCormack, W. P.
Affiliations
Loyola Marymount University (US)
Corresponding author
McCormack, William P.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Nutrition
Published
2020-03-19
Volume
39
Issue
8
Pages
747-755
ISSN
  • 0731-5724 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-1087
OpenAlex
W3011208256
Cited by
58
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
FWCI
5.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
long-distance runners, collegiate athletes, energy availability, nutrient intake, macronutrient intake, micronutrient intake, carbohydrate intake, protein intake, calcium intake, vitamin D intake, iron intake, potassium intake, bone health, endurance athletes, dietary recommendations
MeSH terms
Energy Intake, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Proteins, Energy Metabolism, Female, Humans, Male, Nutritional Status, Running, Students, Trace Elements, Universities, Vitamins, Young Adult, Athletes, Sports Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Recommended Dietary Allowances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review