Nutritional Intake and Energy Availability of Collegiate Distance Runners
Abstract
Objective: Research investigating the dietary habits of distance runners has presented varying results. Proper dietary intake appears to enhance distance running performance and low dietary intake may impact health. The purpose of this investigation was to perform a comprehensive evaluation of nutrient intake of collegiate distance runners with comparison to recommendations for athletes. Methods: Twenty-one men (Age: 19.6 ± 1.2 years; height: 177.1 ± 5.7 cm; body mass: 65.7 ± 4.6 kg; body fat: 15.5 ± 2.2%) and 20 women (Age: 20.2 ± 1.7 years; height: 162.9 ± 6.6 cm; body mass: 53.7 ± 6.5 kg; body fat: 23.3 ± 3.6%) volunteered to participate in the investigation. Energy intake was derived from the Block Food Frequency Questionnaire. Energy availability was calculated by subtracting exercising energy expenditure from daily energy intake, divided by bone free lean mass and fat-free mass. Macronutrient and micronutrient consumption were compared with the appropriate dietary reference intake values, U.S. Dietary Guidelines, or standards recommended for endurance athletes. Results: Dietary intake for the men was 2,741.0 ± 815.2kilocalories and for the women was 1,927.7 ± 638.2kilocalories. A majority of the runners (73%) consumed less than recommended levels of carbohydrates. All men and 75% of women met or exceeded the recommended daily protein intake. Fifty percent of women and 24% of men did not meet the recommended daily allowance for calcium. Ninety-five percent of the runners…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In female collegiate distance runners, 85% consumed less than the recommended amount of carbohydrate, with an average carbohydrate intake of 4.7 ± 1.9 g carbohydrate/kg body weight/day.
“In a study of female collegiate distance runners, 85% of runners consumed less than the recommended amount of CHO, with an average CHO intake of 4.7 ± 1.9 g CHO/kg BW/day [49].”
From Considerations of Low Carbohydrate Availability (LCA) to Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED-S) in Female Endurance Athletes: A Narrative Review (2023) · cites this paper as [49]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 69 · Cited by 58
- Authors
- Beermann, B. L., Lee, D. G., Almstedt, H. C., & McCormack, W. P.
- Affiliations
- Loyola Marymount University (US)
- Corresponding author
- McCormack, William P.
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-03-19
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 747-755
- ISSN
- 0731-5724 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-1087
- OpenAlex
- W3011208256
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 5.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American College of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Keywords
- long-distance runners, collegiate athletes, energy availability, nutrient intake, macronutrient intake, micronutrient intake, carbohydrate intake, protein intake, calcium intake, vitamin D intake, iron intake, potassium intake, bone health, endurance athletes, dietary recommendations
- MeSH terms
- Energy Intake, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Proteins, Energy Metabolism, Female, Humans, Male, Nutritional Status, Running, Students, Trace Elements, Universities, Vitamins, Young Adult, Athletes, Sports Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Recommended Dietary Allowances
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review