The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Older Adults’ Experiences with Audiovisual Virtual Reality: Perceived Usefulness and Other Factors Influencing Technology Acceptance
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study explores how older adults respond to audiovisual virtual reality (VR) and perceive its usefulness to their lives. METHOD: Focus groups were conducted with residents of a retirement community after they viewed two audiovisual VR simulations (n = 41). Thematic analysis was used to identify patterns in responses. RESULTS: Older adults described positive and negative emotional reactions to aspects of the VR experience, articulated content preferences, shared ideas to improve the usability of the equipment, and identified facilitators and barriers that influenced perceived usefulness. Recommendations for improving this technology include maximizing the positive aspects of VR through increasing interactivity, facilitating socializing with friends or family, and enhancing older adults' ease of use. Desired content of simulations involved travel, continuing education, reminiscence, and self-care/therapy. CONCLUSION: Virtual reality was reviewed positively, yet modifications are necessary to facilitate optimal user experience and potential benefit for this population. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: As older adults are interested in using VR, especially if poor health prevents the continuation of desirable activities or new experiences, it is important to respond to older adults' preferences and remove barriers that limit use and enjoyment.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Older adults believed that the resolution of the display must be of high enough quality to ensure a positive experience [50,51].”
From Older Adults’ Experiences and Perceptions of Immersive Virtual Reality: Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [50]
In the citing paper
“Participants in 11/13 of the studies reported issues with the HMD, including that it was too heavy [9,44,45,48,50]; caused general discomfort [9,15,16,44,50]; caused disorientation and imbalance [44,46]; and caused feelings of being trapped, confined [45], afraid, or anxious [16,45].”
From Older Adults’ Experiences and Perceptions of Immersive Virtual Reality: Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [50]
In the citing paper
“Perceptions of the audiovisual quality of IVR hardware varied across studies [14,16,45,48-52]. A total of 5/13 of the studies reported some form of audiovisual issue [14,45,49-51], with feedback that the volume was not at the right level or was not clear enough [45,49-51] or that sound coming from the physical environment could negatively affect the IVR experience [45].”
From Older Adults’ Experiences and Perceptions of Immersive Virtual Reality: Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [50]
In the citing paper
“Difficulties with the HMD being too small to wear with glasses were also described [14,44,46,48,50,51].”
From Older Adults’ Experiences and Perceptions of Immersive Virtual Reality: Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [50]
In the citing paper
“Despite these issues, other studies found that participants reported having a positive experience with IVR from a sitting position [44,50].”
From Older Adults’ Experiences and Perceptions of Immersive Virtual Reality: Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [50]
In the citing paper
“A total of 10/13 of the studies reported participants’ experiences and perceptions of presence and immersion in IVR [9,14-16,46,48-52]. Participants reported that the feeling of presence made the experience feel more real [15] and allowed them to engage with objects in the virtual environment as if they were really present [9]. Participants from 3/13 of the studies explicitly reported enjoying the”
From Older Adults’ Experiences and Perceptions of Immersive Virtual Reality: Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [50]
In the citing paper
“The physical capabilities of the participants and how that influenced their experience with IVR were also reported [9,15,16,44,47,48,50,51]. Having impaired hearing or vision hindered the participants’ experience with IVR [16,50,51]. A lack of mobility also prevented some participants from making the most of the full 360° experience [9,47,48,50], where some found it difficult to turn themselves to”
From Older Adults’ Experiences and Perceptions of Immersive Virtual Reality: Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [50]
In the citing paper
“A total of 11/13 of the studies described feedback on the content presented, specifically the various objects and scenes inside the virtual environment and participants’ experiences navigating them [9,14-16,44,46-48,50-52]. Participants preferred still content to moving content [44,51] and preferred content that was familiar [52], in particular, content similar to past experiences in real life [44”
From Older Adults’ Experiences and Perceptions of Immersive Virtual Reality: Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [50]
In the citing paper
“In 4/13 of the studies that described participants’ experiences navigating the virtual environments, participants had little issue in doing so [44,48,50,52]. Participants found it easier to interact with the virtual environment after a few practice attempts [52] and also once the equipment was fitted correctly as this enabled them to focus on using the handheld controllers [50]. Participants were”
From Older Adults’ Experiences and Perceptions of Immersive Virtual Reality: Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [50]
In the citing paper
“In one case, being able to visit places where they could not physically go themselves brought about a heightened sense of immobility [16]. However, in contrast, participants also reported that IVR could give back agency lost through aging because of physical and mental decline [14,15,50], affording them the opportunity to explore places and take part in activities that, if they were to do in”
From Older Adults’ Experiences and Perceptions of Immersive Virtual Reality: Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [50]
In the citing paper
“A total of 1/13 of the studies reported that the more participants were immersed in the virtual environment, the more it enhanced their experience [48]. Greater immersion provided a heightened travel experience when exploring places around the world [15,16], enabled participants to escape from their own reality [50], and simulated past experiences in a realistic way [49]. Some participants were”
From Older Adults’ Experiences and Perceptions of Immersive Virtual Reality: Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [50]
In the citing paper
“This analytical theme conveys the added agency that IVR afforded older adults in several studies.”
From Older Adults’ Experiences and Perceptions of Immersive Virtual Reality: Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [50]
In the citing paper
“Conflicting participant experiences were present across the synthesis. These conflicts included differences in older adults’ experiences of dizziness and nausea [14,44], wearing the HMD [9,14,15,44,46,48,50,51], and sitting while using IVR [15,44,50].”
From Older Adults’ Experiences and Perceptions of Immersive Virtual Reality: Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [50]
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Qualitative evaluation and research methods
Ellis, D. J. (1990) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/0268-4012(90)90041-p · Cited by 17,943
A Cross-Media Presence Questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory
Lessiter, J., Freeman, J., Keogh, E., & Davidoff, J. (2001) · Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments · doi:10.1162/105474601300343612 · Cited by 1,208
Older adults talk technology: technology usage and attitudes
Mitzner, T. L., Boron, J. B., Fausset, C. B., Adams, A. E., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., Dijkstra, K., Fisk, A. D., Rogers, W. A., & Sharit, J. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.020 · Cited by 1,121
Exergames for Subsyndromal Depression in Older Adults: A Pilot Study of a Novel Intervention
Rosenberg, D., Depp, C. A., Vahia, I. V., Reichstadt, J., Palmer, B. W., Kerr, J., Norman, G., & Jeste, D. V. (2010) · The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/jgp.0b013e3181c534b5 · Cited by 355
Optale, G., Urgesi, C., Busato, V., Marin, S., Piron, L., Priftis, K., Gamberini, L., Capodieci, S., & Bordin, A. (2010) · Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair · doi:10.1177/1545968309353328 · Cited by 318
A Pilot Study of Wii Fit Exergames to Improve Balance in Older Adults
Agmon, M., Perry, C. K., Phelan, E. A., Demiris, G., & Nguyen, H. Q. (2011) · Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy · doi:10.1519/jpt.0b013e3182191d98 · Cited by 311
Bisson, E. J., Contant, B., Sveistrup, H., & Lajoie, Y. (2007) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9997 · Cited by 238
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Charness N., 2010, Handbook of lifespan psychology
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sen, K., Prybutok, G. L., & Prybutok, V. (2022) · SSM: Population Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.101020 · Cited by 360
Appel, L., Appel, E., Bogler, O., Wiseman, M., Cohen, L., Ein, N., Abrams, H. B., & Campos, J. L. (2020) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2019.00329 · Cited by 332
Inclusive AR/VR: accessibility barriers for immersive technologies
Creed, C., Al-Kalbani, M., Theil, A., Sarcar, S., & Williams, I. (2023) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-023-00969-0 · Cited by 214
Virtual reality among the elderly: a usefulness and acceptance study from Taiwan
Syed-Abdul, S., Malwade, S., Nursetyo, A. A., Sood, M., Bhatia, M., Barsasella, D., Liu, M. F., Chang, C.-C., Srinivasan, K., M., R., et al. (2019) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-019-1218-8 · Cited by 211
Dermody, G., Whitehead, L., Wilson, G., & Glass, C. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/17331 · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Roberts, A. R., De Schutter, B., Franks, K., & Radina, M. E.
- Affiliations
- Miami University (US)
- College of Education, Health, and Society, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, USA
- Corresponding author
- Roberts, Amy Restorick
- Venue
- Clinical Gerontologist
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-03-05
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-33
- ISSN
- 0731-7115 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2301
- OpenAlex
- W2792486501
- Cited by
- 151
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 23.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Keywords
- older adults, technology acceptance, perceived usefulness, retirement community residents, usability, interactivity, social interaction, reminiscence, technology adoption barriers
- MeSH terms
- Virtual Reality, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude to Computers, Computer Simulation, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Perception, Socialization, Technology, Focus Groups, Pleasure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review