Peers Reach Out Supporting Peers to Embrace Recovery (PROSPER): A Center for Substance Abuse Treatment Recovery Community Services Program
Abstract
Peers Reach Out Supporting Peers to Embrace Recovery (PROSPER), a Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) Recovery Community Services Program (RCSP) grantee, is based in Los Angeles, California, under the umbrella of its facilitating agency, Walden House, Inc. (WH) that is headquartered in San Francisco, California. There are more than 100,000 men and women in Los Angeles who are on parole, probation, or are being released from state prison and county jails on any given day. Most of those individuals and their families are concentrated in Central and South Central Los Angeles. Peers in the program include people in recovery who have been incarcerated, and their families and significant others. The combined effects of substance abuse and incarceration can be overwhelming for individuals and families, as relapse and recidivism rates indicate. WH believes that social support through a peer-community approach can have a significant impact on this specific population. PROSPER is a unique, strength-based recovery maintenance program based on holistic peer-to-peer social support that complements existing services with a responsive program design that addresses the dual challenge of recovery and reentry. The strategic mix of includes an array of peer-run groups, coaching, workshop/seminars, social and recreational activities, and community events. Establishing a culturally appropriate peer-to-peer recovery community for the target population is timely for WH, given the agency's current work with the population in prisons and in the community; its basic peer-driven approach as a modified therapeutic community; and its experience, expertise, and expansive network serving the criminal justice population in Los Angeles.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Indicators in ToC were often developed from the short-, medium- or long-term outcomes described in the ToC.
“The indicators were often developed from the short-, medium- or long-term outcomes described in the ToC [27, 35, 38, 58, 65, 74, 81, 84].”
From Using theory of change to design and evaluate public health interventions: a systematic review (2015) · cites this paper as [27]
Qualitative data collection methods included interviews, programme observation, programme documentation and visual evidence.
“Qualitative data collection methods included interviews [13, 27, 35, 47, 71, 73, 75, 79], programme observation [13, 27, 35], programme documentation [13, 35, 71, 75, 79] and visual evidence [32].”
From Using theory of change to design and evaluate public health interventions: a systematic review (2015) · cites this paper as [27]
Quantitative data analysis methods included descriptive statistics, inferential statistics, multilevel modelling and path analysis.
“The quantitative data analysis methods were strongly linked to the types of data collected and included descriptive statistics [33], inferential statistics [27, 40, 42, 43, 74, 78], multilevel modelling [16] and path analysis [41].”
From Using theory of change to design and evaluate public health interventions: a systematic review (2015) · cites this paper as [27]
Quantitative data analysis methods were strongly linked to the types of data collected.
“The quantitative data analysis methods were strongly linked to the types of data collected and included descriptive statistics [33], inferential statistics [27, 40, 42, 43, 74, 78], multilevel modelling [16] and path analysis [41].”
From Using theory of change to design and evaluate public health interventions: a systematic review (2015) · cites this paper as [27]
A common description was that the ToC was used to provide a framework for the evaluation.
“A common description was that the ToC was used to provide a framework for the evaluation [27, 32, 33, 48, 64, 72, 74, 78, 79, 81, 82].”
From Using theory of change to design and evaluate public health interventions: a systematic review (2015) · cites this paper as [27]
Cites
A Global Measure of Perceived Stress
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136404 · Cited by 32,807 · see citing works
The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2 · Cited by 13,339 · see citing works
When prisoners come home: parole and prisoner reentry
Petersilia, J. (2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-2504 · Cited by 1,786 · see citing works
A quality of life interview for the chronically mentally ill
Lehman, A. F. (1988) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(88)90033-x · Cited by 1,085 · see citing works
From Prison to Home - The Dimensions and Consequences of Prisoner Reentry
Travis, J., Solomon, A. L., & Waul, M. (2001) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e720982011-001 · Cited by 568 · see citing works
Construct Validation of the Self-Efficacy Scale
Sherer, M., & Adams, C. H. (1983) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1983.53.3.899 · Cited by 472 · see citing works
The Psychological Impact of Incarceration: Implications for Post-Prison Adjustment
Haney, C. W. (2002) · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Prisoner Reentry in Perspective
Lynch, J. P. (2001) · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Harder, D. W. (1990) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1990.67.1.288 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Harder, D. W. (1990) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.67.5.288-290 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Using theory of change to design and evaluate public health interventions: a systematic review
Breuer, E., Lee, L., De Silva, M., & Lund, C. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0422-6 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
Targeting the Barriers in the Substance Use Disorder Continuum of Care With Peer Recovery Support
Stanojlović, M., & Davidson, L. (2021) · Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment · doi:10.1177/1178221820976988 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
South, J., Bagnall, A.-M., Hulme, C., Woodall, J., Longo, R., Dixey, R., Kinsella, K., Raine, G., Vinall-Collier, K., & Wright, J. (2014) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr02350 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
- Authors
- Andreas, D., Ja, D. Y., & Wilson, S.
- Affiliations
- Alliant University (US)
- Venue
- Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-07-08
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 326-338
- ISSN
- 0734-7324 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-4538
- OpenAlex
- W1978800937
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 0.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Keywords
- peer support, substance use disorder recovery, reentry, former prisoners, community supervision, relapse prevention, recidivism, social support, strengths-based approach, therapeutic communities, family support, Los Angeles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review