Cited by 6Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesCounseling, Therapy, and Family DynamicsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

A Naturalistic Evaluation of a Group Intervention for Parents of Youth with Substance Use Disorders

Open access
Ameral, Victoria, Yule, Amy, McKowen, James, Bergman, Brandon G., Nargiso, Jessica, Kelly, John F.·2020·Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly

Abstract

Parents of youth with substance use disorders (SUDs) often play a vital role in successful treatment, yet little is known about interventions designed to help them cope with the stress of this role, especially as delivered in real-world settings. Evaluations of such interventions could potentially inform adaptations to enhance their clinical utility. Parents of youth with SUDs attending a clinician-led group based on the CRAFT model completed measures at intake, 4- and 8-weeks. Parents (n = 545) attended an average of 3.7 sessions; 12% completed all 8 weeks. Analysis of demographic predictors of retention indicated that older parents attended more sessions on average. Overall stress did not change across time points (p > .05). However, parents reported improvement in parent empowerment as measured by the Parent Empowerment Scale, a novel measure of parent empowerment in coping with their child’s SUD (p < .001). Clinician led evidence-informed group services may improve parents’ perceived ability to help their child with their SUD. Low retention rates highlight the need to better understand the factors contributing to retention, and the potential value of adaptations to shorten the intervention. Programs serving youth with SUDs may wish to consider integrating such group services to support parents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07347324.2019.1633978

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CRAFT has been shown to improve the loved ones' perceived empowerment.

    “improve the loved ones' perceived empowerment (62)”

    From Initial insights from a quality improvement initiative to develop an evidence-informed young adult substance use program (2022) · cites this paper as [62]

    The Results (Parent Empowerment) report significant improvements in perceived empowerment among parents attending an eight-week CRAFT-informed group. The Limitations clarify that this was an adapted intervention for parents of youth with substance use disorders and, without a comparison group, the study cannot establish that CRAFT caused the improvement or generalize it to loved ones more broadly. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Cohen S, & Janicki‐Deverts D (2012). Who’s stressed? Distributions of psychological stress in the United States in probability samples from 1983, 2006, and 2009. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(6), 1320– 1334.
  2. Han B, Hedden S, Lipari R, Copello E, & Kroutil L (2015). Receipt of services for behavioral health problems: results from the 2014 National Survey on Drug Use and Health Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 29431966
  3. Kelly JF, & Mee-Lee D (2018). Quality, accountability, and effectiveness in addiction treatment: The Measurement-Based Practice Model. In Danovitch I & Mooney L (Eds.), The Assessment and Treatment of Addiction: Best Practices and New Frontiers (pp. 207– 217). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
  4. White WL, & Miller WR (2007). The use of confrontation in addiction treatment: History, science and time for change. Counselor, 8(4), 12– 30.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ameral, V., Yule, A., McKowen, J., Bergman, B. G., Nargiso, J., & Kelly, J. F.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Ameral, Victoria
Venue
Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly
Published
2019-07-01
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
379-394
ISSN
  • 0734-7324 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-4538
OpenAlex
W2963265063
Cited by
6
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (K23AA025707, K24AA022136)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (5K12DA000357)
  • Office of Academic Affiliations, Department of Veterans Affairs (Interprofessional Advanced Addiction Fellowship)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
group intervention, parental empowerment, parental stress, intervention retention, adolescent substance use disorders, naturalistic assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review