Cited by 28Cancer survivorship and careHead and Neck Cancer StudiesReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Coping Strategies of African American Head and Neck Cancer Survivors

Agarwal, Mansi, Hamilton, Jill B., Crandell, Jamie L., Moore, Charles E.·2010·Journal of Psychosocial Oncology

Abstract

A cross-sectional study was conducted with 50 African American head and neck cancer survivors. Common coping strategies were identified and examined in relation with quality of life and relationship well-being. Coping through support from God, seeking emotional support from family and friends, and helping others were the most commonly used strategies. Having emotional support, being strong and self-reliant, and engaging in distracting activities with family and friends had strongest associations with quality of life. Coping through emotional support, help from God, assistance from one's church family to maintain religious practices, helping others, and engaging in distracting activities with others was more strongly associated with relationship well-being. Future intervention studies should consider these strategies and their possible impact on the physical, psychological, and relationship well-being of this population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07347332.2010.498456

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many studies suggest PRC is associated with better emotional, interpersonal, and global functioning, better overall quality of life, and greater growth.

    “Many studies suggest that PRC is associated with better emotional, interpersonal, and global functioning (Agarwal et al., 2010; Gall, 2004), better overall quality of life (Tarakeshwar et al., 2006), and greater growth (Urcuyo et al., 2005).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Agarwal, M., Hamilton, J. B., Crandell, J. L., & Moore, C. E.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Venue
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology
Published
2010-08-24
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
526-538
ISSN
  • 0734-7332 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-7586
OpenAlex
W2079442343
Cited by
28
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosocial Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p60md000525-04)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR009271)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (5P60-MD000525-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
coping strategies, head and neck cancer survivors, African American patients, quality of life, relational well-being, religious coping, emotional support, helping behavior, family and friends
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Black or African American, Cross-Sectional Studies, Family, Female, Health Surveys, Helping Behavior, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Otorhinolaryngologic Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Religion and Psychology, Social Behavior, Social Support, United States, Survivors, Friends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review