Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phytoremediation of Metals Using Transgenic Plants

Pilon-Smits, Elizabeth, Pilon, Marinus·2002·Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences

Abstract

An ideal plant for environmental cleanup can be envisioned as one with high biomass production, combined with superior capacity for pollutant tolerance, accumulation, and/or degradation, depending on the type of pollutant and the phytoremediation technology of choice. With the use of genetic engineering, it is feasible to manipulate a plant's capacity to tolerate, accumulate, and/or metabolize pollutants, and thus to create the ideal plant for environmental cleanup. In this review, we focus on the design and creation of transgenic plants for phytoremediation of metals. Plant properties important for metal phytoremediation are metal tolerance and accumulation, which are determined by metal uptake, root-shoot translocation, intracellular sequestration, chemical modification, and general stress resistance. If we know which molecular mechanisms are involved in these tolerance and accumulation processes, and which genes control these mechanisms, we can manipulate them to our advantage. This review aims to give a succinct overview of plant metal tolerance and accumulation mechanisms, and to identify possible strategies for genetic engineering of plants for metal phytoremediation. An overview is presented of what has been achieved so far regarding the manipulation of plant metal metabolism. In fact, both enhanced metal tolerance and accumulation have been achieved by overproducing metal chelating molecules (citrate, phytochelatins, metallothioneins, phytosiderophores, ferritin) or by the overexpression of metal transporter proteins. Mercury volatilization and tolerance was achieved by introduction of a bacterial pathway. The typical increase in metal accumulation as the result of these genetic engineering approaches is 2-to 3-fold more metal per plant, which could potentially enhance phytoremediation efficiency by the same factor. As for the applicability of these transgenics for environmental cleanup, results from lab and greenhouse studies look promising for several of these transgenics, but field studies will be the ultimate test to establish their phytoremediation potential, their competitiveness, and risks associated with their use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0735-260291044313

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 294

Metadata

Authors
Pilon-Smits, E., & Pilon, M.
Venue
Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
Published
2002-09
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
439-456
ISSN
  • 0735-2689 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-7836
OpenAlex
W2019120247
Cited by
294
References
2
FWCI
13.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phytoremediation of Metals Using Transgenic Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0735-260291044313
The paper
Pilon-Smits, E., & Pilon, M. (2002). Phytoremediation of Metals Using Transgenic Plants. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735-260291044313

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.