The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Salinity Tolerance in Brassica Oilseeds
Abstract
Brassica oilseed species now hold the third position among oilseed crops and are an important source of vegetable oil. The most common Brassica oil-seed crops grown for commercial purposes are rape seeds, (Brassica campestris L. and B. napus L.) and mustards (B. juncea (L.) Czern. & Coss. and B. carinata A.Br.). The other Brassica species such as B. nigra (L.) Koch and B. tournefortii Gouan are grown on a very small scale. Brassica napus, B. juncea, and B. carinata are amphidiploids, whereas B. campestris and B. nigra are diploid. Most of the Brassica species have been categorized as moderately salt tolerant, with the amphidiploid species being the relatively salt tolerant in comparison with the diploid species. Due to the higher salt tolerance of the amphidiploids, it has been suggested that their salt tolerance has been acquired from the A (B. campestris) and C (B. oleracea L.) genomes. However, significant inter- and intraspecific variation for salt tolerance exists within brassicas, which can be exploited through selection and breeding for enhancing salt tolerance of the crops. There are contrasting reports regarding the response of these species to salinity at different plant developmental stages, but in most of them it is evident that they maintain their degree of salt tolerance consistently throughout the plant ontogeny. The pattern of uptake and accumulation of toxic ions (Na+ and Cl−), in tissues of plants subjected to saline conditions appears to be mostly due to mechanism of partial ion exclusion (exclusion of Na+ and/or Cl−) in most of the species, although ion inclusion in some cases at intraspecific levels has also been observed. Maintenance of high tissue K+/Na+ and Ca2 +/Na+ ratios has been suggested as an important selection criterion for salt-tolerance in brassicas. Osmotic adjustment has also been reported in Brassica plants subjected to saline conditions, but particularly to a large extent in salt-tolerant species or cultivars. The roles of important organic osmotica such as total soluble sugars, free amino acids, and free proline, which are central to osmotic adjustment, have been discussed. In canola, B. napus, no positive relationship has been observed between salt tolerance and erucic acid content of seed oil in different cultivars. Furthermore, glucosinolate content of the seed meal in canola generally increases with an increase in salt level of the growth medium. This review highlights the responses of potential Brassica crops to soil salinity from the whole plant to the molecular level. It also describes the efforts made during the past millennium in uncovering the mechanism(s) of salinity tolerance of these crops both at the whole plant and cellular levels. The important selection criteria, which are used by researchers to enhance the degree of salinity tolerance in brassicas, are summarized. In addition, the vital role of genetic engineering and molecular biology approaches to the improvement of salt tolerance in brassicas is emphasized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting
Vos, P., Hogers, R., Bleeker, M., Reijans, M., Lee, T. V. D., Hornes, M., Friters, A., Pot, J., Paleman, J., Kuiper, M., et al. (1995) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/23.21.4407 · Cited by 12,401
Comparative physiology of salt and water stress
Munns, R. (2002) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00808.x · Cited by 6,331
S ALT AND D ROUGHT S TRESS S IGNAL T RANSDUCTION IN P LANTS
Zhu, J.-K. (2002) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.091401.143329 · Cited by 5,835
Mechanisms of Salt Tolerance in Nonhalophytes
Greenway, H., & Munns, R. (1980) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.31.060180.001053 · Cited by 4,003
Crop Salt Tolerance—Current Assessment
Maas, E. V., & Hoffman, G. J. (1977) · Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division · doi:10.1061/jrcea4.0001137 · Cited by 3,565
Zhu, J.-K. (2001) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(00)01838-0 · Cited by 3,511
Na+ Tolerance and Na+ Transport in Higher Plants
TESTER, M. (2003) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcg058 · Cited by 3,250
The Mechanism of Salt Tolerance in Halophytes
Flowers, T. J., Troke, P. F., & Yeo, A. R. (1977) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.28.060177.000513 · Cited by 1,942
Physiological processes limiting plant growth in saline soils: some dogmas and hypotheses
MUNNS, R. (1993) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1993.tb00840.x · Cited by 1,474
Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress
(1999) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780824746728 · Cited by 1,326
Metadata
- Authors
- Ashraf, M., & McNeilly, T.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 157-174
- ISSN
- 0735-2689 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7836
- OpenAlex
- W2066928153
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 83
- FWCI
- 6.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Salinity Tolerance in Brassica Oilseeds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07352680490433286
- The paper
- Ashraf, M., & McNeilly, T. (2004). Salinity Tolerance in Brassica Oilseeds. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680490433286
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.