The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Kudzu (Pueraria montana): History, Physiology, and Ecology Combine to Make a Major Ecosystem Threat
Abstract
Kudzu, Pueraria montana (Lour.) Merr. variety lobata (Willd.) was introduced into the United States at the 1876 Centennial Exposition in Philadelphia, PA. Subsequently, it was planted widely to reduce soil erosion by the Soil Erosion Service and Civilian Conservation Corp. Over 85 million seedlings of kudzu were provided to landowners by government agencies in the southeast in the first half of the 20th century. In 1953, kudzu was removed from the list of approved plants for erosion control, in 1970 it was officially labeled a weed, and in 1997 it was placed on the Federal Obnoxious Weed List. Its rapid elongation rates, high leaf area indices, high photosynthetic rates, and frequent rooting at stem nodes make kudzu an aggressive competitor with native shrubs and trees. Estimates are that kudzu currently covers 3 million hectares throughout the eastern United States and is spreading by 50,000 ha per year. Despite widespread anecdotal statements, little quantitative information is available regarding the ecological effects of kudzu. The ability of kudzu to overtop and shade forest trees, fix atmospheric nitrogen, and emit isoprene suggest that it may have substantial effects on native forest biodiversity, forest nitrogen cycles, watershed nitrogen saturation, freshwater eutrophication, and regional air quality. Kudzu's growth rate increases strongly in response to increased CO2, and without the constraint of allocation to woody tissue this response may increase the competitive dominance of kudzu as atmospheric levels of CO2 increase. This fact, combined with its sensitivity to cold temperatures, implies that kudzu may increase its range in future warmer, high-CO2 environments. The lack of quantitative investigations on the ecological effects of kudzu is a severe impediment to our understanding of its current and future effects on native plant and animal communities and forest ecosystems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harper, J. L. (1977) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 9,128
Trenbath, B., & Harper, J. L. (1978) · The Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2402622 · Cited by 6,942
BIOTIC INVASIONS: CAUSES, EPIDEMIOLOGY, GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES, AND CONTROL
Mack, R. N., Simberloff, D., Mark Lonsdale, W., Evans, H., Clout, M., & Bazzaz, F. A. (2000) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0689:bicegc]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 6,156
HUMAN ALTERATION OF THE GLOBAL NITROGEN CYCLE: SOURCES AND CONSEQUENCES
Vitousek, P. M., Aber, J. D., Howarth, R. W., Likens, G. E., Matson, P. A., Schindler, D. W., Schlesinger, W. H., & Tilman, D. G. (1997) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0737:haotgn]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 5,390
Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility
Davis, M. A., Grime, J. P., & Thompson, K. (2000) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00473.x · Cited by 3,447
Biological Invasions by Exotic Grasses, the Grass/Fire Cycle, and Global Change
D'Antonio, C. M., & Vitousek, P. M. (1992) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.000431 · Cited by 3,399
Xylem Structure and the Ascent of Sap
Tyree, M. T., & Zimmermann, M. H. (2002) · Springer Series in Wood Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-04931-0 · Cited by 3,169
Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States
PIMENTEL, D., LACH, L., ZUNIGA, R., & MORRISON, D. (2000) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0053:eaecon]2.3.co;2 · Cited by 2,966
The Ecology of Interfaces: Riparian Zones
Naiman, R. J., & Décamps, H. (1997) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.621 · Cited by 2,791
Allozyme diversity in plant species
Hamrick, J. L., & Godt, M. J. W. (1990) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,643
Cited by
Invasive species, ecosystem services and human well-being
Pejchar, L., & Mooney, H. A. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.016 · Cited by 1,362
Invasive alien plant species: Their impact on environment, ecosystem services and human health
Kumar Rai, P., & Singh, J. S. (2020) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.106020 · Cited by 616
Climate change increases risk of plant invasion in the Eastern United States
Bradley, B. A., Wilcove, D. S., & Oppenheimer, M. (2010) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-009-9597-y · Cited by 330
Metadata
- Authors
- Forseth, I. N., & Innis, A. F.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 401-413
- ISSN
- 0735-2689 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7836
- OpenAlex
- W2024463962
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 3.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kudzu (Pueraria montana): History, Physiology, and Ecology Combine to Make a Major Ecosystem Threat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07352680490505150
- The paper
- Forseth, I. N., & Innis, A. F. (2004). Kudzu (Pueraria montana): History, Physiology, and Ecology Combine to Make a Major Ecosystem Threat. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680490505150
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.