The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant Root Responses to Three Abundant Soil Minerals: Silicon, Aluminum and Iron
Abstract
Silicon (Si), aluminum (Al), and iron (Fe) are the three most abundant minerals in soil; however, their effects on plants differ because they are beneficial, toxic, and essential to plant growth, respectively. High accumulation of silicon in the shoots helps some plants to overcome a range of biotic and abiotic stresses. However, plants vary in their ability to take up Si from the soil and load it into the xylem and so the accumulation of silicon varies greatly between plant species. Aluminum toxicity is characterized by a rapid inhibition of root elongation but some species and even genotypes within species can tolerate Al toxicity better than others. While the mechanisms controlling this tolerance in most of the more resistant species are poorly understood, some plants are able to detoxify Al externally and/or internally by complexation with ligands or by pH changes in the rhizosphere. Iron is taken up from the soil by two efficient mechanisms called Strategy I and Strategy II, which operate in distinct phylogenic groups. Strategy I plants increase soil Fe solubility by releasing protons and reductants/chelators, such as organic acids and phenolics, into the rhizosphere, while Strategy II plants are characterized by the secretion of ferric chelating substances (phytosiderophores) coupled with a specific Fe3+: chelate uptake system. In this review, the molecular mechanisms underlying root response to Si, Al, and Fe are described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The physiology of metal toxicity in plants
Foy, C. D., Chaney, R. L., & White, M. C. (1978) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.29.060178.002455 · Cited by 2,170
IRT1, an Arabidopsis Transporter Essential for Iron Uptake from the Soil and for Plant Growth
Vert, G., Grotz, N., Dédaldéchamp, F., Gaymard, F., Guerinot, M. L., Briat, J.-F., & Curie, C. (2002) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.001388 · Cited by 1,679
Cited by
Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria: Mechanisms and Applications
Glick, B. R. (2012) · Scientifica · doi:10.6064/2012/963401 · Cited by 3,346
Rashid, M. I., Mujawar, L. H., Shahzad, T., Almeelbi, T., Ismail, I. M. I., & Oves, M. (2016) · Microbiological Research · doi:10.1016/j.micres.2015.11.007 · Cited by 894
Li, L., Tilman, D., Lambers, H., & Zhang, F. (2014) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12778 · Cited by 664
Plant-microbe-soil interactions in the rhizosphere: an evolutionary perspective
Lambers, H., Mougel, C., Jaillard, B., & Hinsinger, P. (2009) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-009-0042-x · Cited by 630
Root exudates contribute to belowground ecosystem hotspots: A review
Ma, W., Tang, S., Dengzeng, Z., Zhang, D., Zhang, T., & Ma, X. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.937940 · Cited by 481
Metadata
- Authors
- Ma, J. F.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 267-281
- ISSN
- 0735-2689 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7836
- OpenAlex
- W1989104106
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant Root Responses to Three Abundant Soil Minerals: Silicon, Aluminum and Iron. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07352680500196017
- The paper
- Ma, J. F. (2005). Plant Root Responses to Three Abundant Soil Minerals: Silicon, Aluminum and Iron. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680500196017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.