The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nitrogen Management Affects Carbon Sequestration in North American Cropland Soils
Abstract
Agricultural soils in North America can be a sink for rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations through the formation of soil organic matter (SOM) or humus. Humification is limited by the availability of nutrients such as nitrogen (N). Recommended management practices (RMPs) that optimize N availability foster humus formation. This review examines the management practices that contribute to maximizing N availability for optimizing sequestration of atmospheric CO2 into soil humus. Farming practices that enhance nutrient use, reduce or eliminate tillage, and increase crop intensity, together, affect N availability and, therefore, C sequestration. N additions, from especially, livestock manure and leguminous cover crops are necessary for increasing grain and biomass yields and returning crop residues to the soil thereby increasing soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration. Conservation tillage practices enhance also the availability of N and increase SOC concentration. Increase in cropping intensity and/or crop rotations produce higher quantity and quality of residues, increase availability of N, and therefore foster increase in C sequestration. The benefit of C sequestration from N additions may be negated by CO2 and N2O emissions associated with production and application of N fertilizers. More studies need to be conducted to ascertain the benefits of adding N via manuring versus N fertilizer additions. Furthermore, site specific adaptive research is needed to identify RMPs that optimize soil N use efficiency while improving crop yield and C sequestration thereby curbing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Due to the wide range of climate in North America, there is a large range of C sequestration potential in agricultural soils through N management. Humid croplands may have the potential to sequester 8–298 Tg C yr−1 while dry croplands may sequester 1–35 Tg C yr−1. These estimates, however, are highly uncertain and wide-ranging. Clearly, more research is needed to quantify, more precisely, the C sequestration potential across different N management scenarios especially in Mexico and Canada.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nitrogen and Lignin Control of Hardwood Leaf Litter Decomposition Dynamics
Melillo, J. M., Aber, J. D., & Muratore, J. F. (1982) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1936780 · Cited by 2,641
Soil carbon sequestration and land‐use change: processes and potential
Post, W. M., & Kwon, K. C. (2000) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00308.x · Cited by 2,602
Management effects on soil C storage on the Canadian prairies
Janzen, H. H., Campbell, C. A., Izaurralde, R. C., Ellert, B. H., Juma, N., McGill, W. B., & Zentner, R. P. (1998) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/s0167-1987(98)00105-6 · Cited by 411
Crop Rotations and Nitrogen Fertilization to Manage Soil Organic Carbon Dynamics
Studdert, G. A., & Echeverría, H. E. (2000) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2000.6441496x · Cited by 230
Impact of Nitrogen Fertilization and Cropping System on Carbon Sequestration in Midwestern Mollisols
Russell, A. E., Laird, D. A., Parkin, T. B., & Mallarino, A. P. (2005) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2005.0413 · Cited by 213
Cited by
Plant functional composition influences rates of soil carbon and nitrogen accumulation
Fornara, D. A., & Tilman, D. (2008) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01345.x · Cited by 808
Richardson, D., Felgate, H., Watmough, N., Thomson, A., & Baggs, E. (2009) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.03.009 · Cited by 549
Stable soil organic matter: A comparison of C:N:P:S ratios in Australian and other world soils
Kirkby, C. A., Kirkegaard, J. A., Richardson, A. E., Wade, L. J., Blanchard, C., & Batten, G. (2011) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.04.010 · Cited by 494
Grandy, A. S., Salam, D. S., Wickings, K., McDaniel, M. D., Culman, S. W., & Snapp, S. S. (2013) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2013.04.020 · Cited by 122
Estimating root: shoot ratio and soil carbon inputs in temperate grasslands with the RothC model
Poeplau, C. (2016) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-016-3017-8 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Christopher, S. F., & Lal, R.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-02-02
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-64
- ISSN
- 0735-2689 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7836
- OpenAlex
- W2080078384
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 13.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitrogen Management Affects Carbon Sequestration in North American Cropland Soils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07352680601174830
- The paper
- Christopher, S. F., & Lal, R. (2007). Nitrogen Management Affects Carbon Sequestration in North American Cropland Soils. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680601174830
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.