The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Breeding for Yield Potential and Stress Adaptation in Cereals
Abstract
The need to accelerate breeding for increased yield potential and better adaptation to drought and other abiotic stresses is an issue of increasing urgency. As the population continues to grow rapidly, the pressure on resources (mainly untouched land and water) is also increasing, and potential climate change poses further challenges. We discuss ways to improve the efficiency of crop breeding through a better physiological understanding by both conventional and molecular methods. Thus the review highlights the physiological basis of crop yield and its response to stresses, with special emphasis on drought. This is not just because physiology forms the basis of proper phenotyping, one of the pillars of breeding, but because a full understanding of physiology is also needed, for example, to design the traits targeted by molecular breeding approaches such as marker-assisted selection (MAS) or plant transformation or the way these traits are evaluated. Most of the information in this review deals with cereals, since they include the world's main crops, however, examples from other crops are also included. Topics covered by the review include the conceptual framework for identifying secondary traits associated with yield potential and stress adaptation, and how to measure these secondary traits in practice. The second part of the review deals with the real role of molecular breeding for complex traits from a physiological perspective. This part examines current developments in MAS and quantitative trait loci (QTL) detection as well as plant transformation. Emphasis is placed on the current limitations of these molecular approaches to improving stress adaptation and yield potential. The essay ends by presenting some ideas regarding future avenues for crop breeding given the current and possible future challenges, and on a multidisciplinary approach where physiological knowledge and proper phenotyping play a major role.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plant breeding and drought in C3 cereals: What should we breed for?
ARAUS, J. L. (2002) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcf049 · Cited by 1,243 · cited 19×
“Drought is highly variable; there exist different kinds of drought depending, for example, on the severity of the water shortage or the phase in the crop cycle when it occurs (Araus et al., 2002).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialFischer, R. A., Rees, D., Sayre, K. D., Lu, Z. ‐., Condon, A. G., & Saavedra, A. L. (1998) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183x003800060011x · Cited by 887
Finding genes that underlie complex traits.
Glazier, A. M., Nadeau, J. H., & Aitman, T. J. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1076641 · Cited by 855
Genetic improvements in winter wheat yields since 1900 and associated physiological changes.
Austin, R. B., Bingham, J., Blackwell, R. D., Evans, L. T., Ford, M. A., Morgan, C. L., & Taylor, M. (1980) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859600028665 · Cited by 805
Yield Improvement in Temperate Maize is Attributable to Greater Stress Tolerance
Tollenaar, M., & Wu, J. (1999) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci1999.3961597x · Cited by 609
Quantitative Trait Loci and Crop Performance under Abiotic Stress: Where Do We Stand?: Table I.
Collins, N. C., Tardieu, F., & Tuberosa, R. (2008) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.108.118117 · Cited by 559
TUBEROSA, R. (2002) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcf134 · Cited by 397
Welcker, C., Boussuge, B., Bencivenni, C., Ribaut, J.-M., & Tardieu, F. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erl227 · Cited by 174
Cited by
A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures
Abbass, K., Qasim, M. Z., Song, H., Murshed, M., Mahmood, H., & Younis, I. (2022) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6 · Cited by 2,359
Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier
Araus, J. L., & Cairns, J. E. (2014) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2013.09.008 · Cited by 1,817
Self-citationNonlinear heat effects on African maize as evidenced by historical yield trials
Lobell, D. B., Bänziger, M., Magorokosho, C., & Vivek, B. (2011) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1043 · Cited by 1,206
Coarse and fine regulation of wheat yield components in response to genotype and environment
Slafer, G. A., Savin, R., & Sadras, V. O. (2014) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2013.12.004 · Cited by 487
Self-citationCRISPR/cas9 genome editing in wheat
Kim, D., Alptekin, B., & Budak, H. (2018) · Functional & Integrative Genomics · doi:10.1007/s10142-017-0572-x · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Araus, J. L., Slafer, G. A., Royo, C., & Serret, M. D.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-11-18
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 377-412
- ISSN
- 0735-2689 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7836
- OpenAlex
- W2162413233
- Cited by
- 806
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 22.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Breeding for Yield Potential and Stress Adaptation in Cereals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07352680802467736
- The paper
- Araus, J. L., Slafer, G. A., Royo, C., & Serret, M. D. (2008). Breeding for Yield Potential and Stress Adaptation in Cereals. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680802467736
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.