The DOI matches its Crossref record; 118 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fine Root Biomass, Production, Turnover Rates, and Nutrient Contents in Boreal Forest Ecosystems in Relation to Species, Climate, Fertility, and Stand Age: Literature Review and Meta-Analyses
Abstract
Fine roots <2 mm in diameter play a key role in regulating the biogeochemical cycles of ecosystems and are important to our understanding of ecosystem responses to global climate changes. Given the sensitivity of fine roots, especially in boreal region, to climate changes, it is important to assess whether and to what extent fine roots in this region change with climates. Here, in this synthesis, a data set of 218 root studies were complied to examine fine root patterns in the boreal forest in relation to site and climatic factors. The mean fine root biomass in the boreal forest was 5.28 Mg ha−1, and the production of fine roots was 2.82 Mg ha−1 yr−1, accounting for 32% of annual net primary production of the boreal forest. Fine roots in the boreal forest on average turned over 1.07 times per year. Fine roots contained 50.9 kg ha−1 of nitrogen (N) and 3.63 kg ha−1 of phosphorous (P). In total, fine roots in the boreal forest ecosystems contain 6.1 × 107 Mg N and 4.4×106Mg P pools, respectively, about 10% of the global nutrients of fine roots. Fine root biomass, production, and turnover rate generally increased with increasing mean annual temperature and precipitation. Fine root biomass in the boreal forest decreased significantly with soil N and P availability. With increasing stand age, fine root biomass increased until about 100 years old for forest stands and then leveled off or decreased thereafter. These results of meta analysis suggest that environmental factors strongly influence fine root biomass, production, and turnover in boreal forest, and future studies should place a particular emphasis on the root-environment relationships.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Odum, E. P. (1969) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.164.3877.262 · Cited by 5,433
Keeney, D. R., & Nelson, D. W. (1982) · Agronomy Monographs · doi:10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c33 · Cited by 4,534
Experiments in ecology their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance
Underwood, A. J. (1997) · Cited by 3,799
Biogeochemistry: an Analysis of Global Change
(1991) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2012-0-01654-7 · Cited by 3,443
Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems
Dixon, R. K., Solomon, A. M., Brown, S., Houghton, R. A., Trexier, M. C., & Wisniewski, J. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.263.5144.185 · Cited by 3,403
A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes
Jackson, R. B., Canadell, J., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E., & Schulze, E. D. (1996) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00333714 · Cited by 3,071
Hatfield, J. L. (1998) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq1998.00472425002700010038x · Cited by 2,871
Saier, M. H. (2007) · Water, Air, and Soil Pollution · doi:10.1007/s11270-007-9372-6 · Cited by 1,974
Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production
Melillo, J. M., McGuire, A. D., Kicklighter, D. W., Moore, B., Vorosmarty, C. J., & Schloss, A. L. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/363234a0 · Cited by 1,954
Cited by
The biomass distribution on Earth
Bar-On, Y. M., Phillips, R., & Milo, R. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1711842115 · Cited by 3,723
“(121) to published censuses of fine-root biomass in boreal forests (21, 123), the values by Stögmann are about 6-fold larger than the characteristic fine-root biomass densities reported.”
BackgroundPlant diversity enhances productivity and soil carbon storage
Chen, S., Wang, W., Xu, W., Wang, Y., Wan, H., Chen, D., Tang, Z., Tang, X., Zhou, G., Xie, Z., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1700298114 · Cited by 743
Linking litter decomposition of above‐ and below‐ground organs to plant–soil feedbacks worldwide
Freschet, G. T., Cornwell, W. K., Wardle, D. A., Elumeeva, T. G., Liu, W., Jackson, B. G., Onipchenko, V. G., Soudzilovskaia, N. A., Tao, J., & Cornelissen, J. H. C. (2013) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12092 · Cited by 553
Augusto, L., De Schrijver, A., Vesterdal, L., Smolander, A., Prescott, C., & Ranger, J. (2015) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12119 · Cited by 411
Climate, soil and plant functional types as drivers of global fine‐root trait variation
Freschet, G. T., Valverde‐Barrantes, O. J., Tucker, C. M., Craine, J. M., McCormack, M. L., Violle, C., Fort, F., Blackwood, C. B., Urban‐Mead, K. R., Iversen, C. M., et al. (2017) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12769 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Yuan, Z. Y., & Chen, H. Y. H.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-07-08
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 204-221
- ISSN
- 0735-2689 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7836
- OpenAlex
- W2149647145
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 118
- FWCI
- 28.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fine Root Biomass, Production, Turnover Rates, and Nutrient Contents in Boreal Forest Ecosystems in Relation to Species, Climate, Fertility, and Stand Age: Literature Review and Meta-Analyses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07352689.2010.483579
- The paper
- Yuan, Z. Y., & Chen, H. Y. H. (2010). Fine Root Biomass, Production, Turnover Rates, and Nutrient Contents in Boreal Forest Ecosystems in Relation to Species, Climate, Fertility, and Stand Age: Literature Review and Meta-Analyses. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2010.483579
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.