Cited by 248Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental StudiesMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactantsEnvironmental Chemistry and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Biotechnological basis of microbial consortia for the removal of pesticides from the environment

Abstract

The application of microbial strains as axenic cultures has frequently been employed in a diverse range of sectors. In the natural environment, microbes exist as multispecies and perform better than monocultures. Cell signaling and communication pathways play a key role in engineering microbial consortia, because in a consortium, the microorganisms communicate via diffusible signal molecules. Mixed microbial cultures have gained little attention due to the lack of proper knowledge about their interactions with each other. Some ideas have been proposed to deal with and study various microbes when they live together as a community, for biotechnological application purposes. In natural environments, microbes can possess unique metabolic features. Therefore, microbial consortia divide the metabolic burden among strains in the group and robustly perform pesticide degradation. Synthetic microbial consortia can perform the desired functions at naturally contaminated sites. Therefore, in this article, special attention is paid to the microbial consortia and their function in the natural environment. This review comprehensively discusses the recent applications of microbial consortia in pesticide degradation and environmental bioremediation. Moreover, the future directions of synthetic consortia have been explored. The review also explores the future perspectives and new platforms for these approaches, besides highlighting the practical understanding of the scientific information behi…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07388551.2020.1853032

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Functional differentiation and metabolite exchange within microbial consortia enable complex metabolic tasks, yet the underlying mechanisms governing microbial interactions require further investigation for effective industrial applications.

    “The functional differentiation and metabolite exchange within these consortia enable complex metabolic tasks, yet the underlying mechanisms governing microbial interactions require further investigation for effective industrial applications [37].”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 175

  1. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01754 · DOI
  2. Bhatt P., 2019, Smart bioremediation technologies: microbial enzymes
  3. 10.3390/molecules25030738 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109138 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127419 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1186/s12940-020-0571-6 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/ps.5577 · DOI
  8. Qian X, 2019, Biotechnol Adv, 18, 107500
  9. 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00203 · DOI
  10. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02594 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.ece.2012.02.002 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/07388551.2018.1471445 · DOI
  13. 10.1126/science.1070633 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/B978-0-12-818732-6.00025-3 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.07.004 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.110143 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/03067319.2020.1715375 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.020 · DOI
  19. 10.1007/s11356-017-0048-5 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110734 · DOI
  21. Sun X, 2020, J Environ Sci Health Part B, 21, 1
  22. 10.1007/s00284-020-02115-y · DOI
  23. 10.1038/ismej.2016.22 · DOI
  24. 10.1128/mBio.00036-12 · DOI
  25. 10.1073/pnas.1412673111 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/1462-2920.13028 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/s41598-019-54978-2 · DOI
  28. 10.1155/2013/392573 · DOI
  29. 10.1023/B:WIBI.0000040405.56291.52 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.jtice.2014.06.014 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.04.063 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122720 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.018 · DOI
  34. 10.1128/AEM.57.3.744-750.1991 · DOI
  35. 10.1128/AEM.00393-10 · DOI
  36. 10.1128/AEM.03730-12 · DOI
  37. 10.1128/AEM.01684-17 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.113951 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00066-3 · DOI
  40. Bilgin A, 2019, Waste Biomass Valori, 1, 1, 10.26480/jwbm.02.2019.01.04 · DOI
  41. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00409 · DOI
  42. 10.1186/s12934-019-1083-3 · DOI
  43. Netzer F, 2018, Handbook of hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology, 1
  44. 10.1038/nbt.3095 · DOI
  45. 10.1002/jcp.25428 · DOI
  46. 10.3390/microorganisms8040593 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.11.002 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.mib.2016.03.010 · DOI
  49. Revitt D, Ellis JB, Llewellyn NR. Herbicide behavior in the runoff from an urban catchment. In: 8th International Conference on Urban Storm Drainage, Sydney, 1999. p. 96–104.
  50. Lushchak VI, 2018, Excli J, 17, 1101
  51. 10.1016/B978-0-444-52272-6.00592-4 · DOI
  52. Katagi T., 2020, Rev Environ Contam Toxicol, 204, 1
  53. 10.1080/10408440802116496 · DOI
  54. Giddings JM, 2005, A probabilistic aquatic ecological risk assessment of atrazine in North American surface waters
  55. 10.1016/0147-6513(88)90058-9 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/S1382-6689(02)00126-6 · DOI
  57. Landrum PF, 1998, Lipids in freshwater ecosystems, 203
  58. 10.1016/B978-0-12-374367-1.00038-0 · DOI
  59. Hodgson E, 2001, Introduction to biochemical toxicology, 67
  60. 10.1002/chir.22989 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.trac.2019.115719 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.08.011 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/j.trac.2018.11.010 · DOI
  64. 10.1016/B978-0-12-382032-7.10039-6 · DOI
  65. 10.1038/nchembio.197 · DOI
  66. 10.1007/s11274-016-2137-x · DOI
  67. 10.1007/978-3-319-05738-5_8 · DOI
  68. 10.1007/s13205-016-0541-4 · DOI
  69. 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123074 · DOI
  70. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00103.x · DOI
  71. 10.1128/AEM.60.2.434-446.1994 · DOI
  72. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.10.084 · DOI
  73. 10.1186/1735-2746-10-21 · DOI
  74. 10.30638/eemj.2018.052 · DOI
  75. 10.1111/jam.12627 · DOI
  76. 10.1038/s41598-017-15122-0 · DOI
  77. 10.1038/nature06279 · DOI
  78. 10.1080/09603123.2018.1487043 · DOI
  79. 10.1007/s00284-019-01774-w · DOI
  80. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140968 · DOI
  81. 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123845 · DOI
  82. 10.3390/ijerph16162873 · DOI
  83. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.10.024 · DOI
  84. 10.1080/10889868.2019.1569586 · DOI
  85. Balakrishnan SL, 2019, JPAM, 13, 393
  86. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.03.053 · DOI
  87. 10.1080/15320383.2016.1190684 · DOI
  88. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2011.06.001 · DOI
  89. 10.1039/C3RA44892D · DOI
  90. 10.1038/s41598-019-48904-9 · DOI
  91. 10.1007/s11274-011-0879-z · DOI
  92. 10.1007/s11356-014-3354-1 · DOI
  93. 10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.02.014 · DOI
  94. 10.1007/s10532-019-09873-y · DOI
  95. 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b03703 · DOI
  96. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01429 · DOI
  97. Teerakun M, 2020, Int J Geomat, 68, 73
  98. 10.1007/s00253-017-8128-5 · DOI
  99. 10.1007/s10532-017-9803-z · DOI
  100. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04027 · DOI
  101. 10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.04.015 · DOI
  102. 10.1016/j.jtice.2011.11.002 · DOI
  103. Mutua GK, 2016, Kenya Toxicol Environ Chem, 98, 800
  104. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121493 · DOI
  105. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121834 · DOI
  106. dos Anjos CS, 2020, J Braz Chem Soc, 31, 1654
  107. 10.1016/j.biteb.2020.100415 · DOI
  108. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.06.018 · DOI
  109. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.12.065 · DOI
  110. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.069 · DOI
  111. 10.1016/j.jece.2018.03.030 · DOI
  112. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00522 · DOI · Paper page
  113. 10.1007/s13762-014-0675-z · DOI
  114. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.044 · DOI
  115. Raju SM, 2017, Biotechnol Commun, 10, 697
  116. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.02.022 · DOI
  117. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.07.020 · DOI
  118. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.172 · DOI
  119. 10.1016/j.procbio.2018.12.031 · DOI
  120. 10.1038/nrmicro2832 · DOI
  121. 10.1038/nrmicro2939 · DOI
  122. 10.1016/j.ymben.2016.12.008 · DOI
  123. 10.1186/s12934-015-0219-3 · DOI
  124. 10.1038/ncomms5750 · DOI
  125. 10.1007/s13205-016-0372-3 · DOI
  126. 10.1016/j.copbio.2015.08.008 · DOI
  127. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.05.004 · DOI
  128. 10.1073/pnas.1810949115 · DOI · Paper page
  129. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02867 · DOI
  130. 10.1078/0944-5013-00167 · DOI
  131. 10.1016/j.mec.2019.e00095 · DOI
  132. 10.1007/s00248-002-1046-8 · DOI
  133. 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2851:TIOMAA]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  134. 10.1016/S0958-1669(03)00065-X · DOI
  135. 10.1007/s00248-007-9357-4 · DOI
  136. 10.1038/msb.2010.66 · DOI
  137. 10.1038/s41598-018-31082-5 · DOI
  138. 10.1007/s002530100624 · DOI
  139. 10.1016/j.peptides.2003.11.026 · DOI
  140. 10.1016/S0196-9781(01)00493-4 · DOI
  141. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.04.067 · DOI
  142. 10.1073/pnas.0704256104 · DOI
  143. Hawley AK, 2015, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 112, 15450, 10.1073/pnas.1506034112 · DOI · Paper page
  144. 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00005 · DOI
  145. 10.1016/j.ymben.2019.08.007 · DOI
  146. Bhatt P, Gangola S, Bhandari G, et al. New insights into the degradation of synthetic pollutants in contaminated environments. Chemosphere. 2021;268:128827. · DOI
  147. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00087 · DOI
  148. Bhatt P, Zhou X, Huang Y, et al. Characterization of the role of esterases in the biodegradation of organophosphate, carbamate, and pyrethroid pesticides. J Hazard Mater. 2021;411:125026 · DOI
  149. 10.1073/pnas.0610575104 · DOI
  150. 10.1128/JB.00345-12 · DOI
  151. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125507 · DOI
  152. 10.5897/AJMR2014.6842 · DOI
  153. 10.1016/j.bcab.2017.06.009 · DOI
  154. 10.1016/j.bcab.2018.09.001 · DOI
  155. 10.1504/IJEWM.2017.090050 · DOI
  156. 10.1186/s40643-018-0213-9 · DOI
  157. 10.1111/j.1470-8744.1998.tb01377.x · DOI
  158. Rogers SL, McClure N. In: Head IM, Singleton I, Milner MG, editors. Bioremediation: a criticial review. Wymondham (UK): Horizon Scientific Press; 2003. p. 27–59.
  159. 10.1016/0922-338X(96)81465-6 · DOI
  160. 10.1007/s10529-013-1195-5 · DOI
  161. 10.1007/978-981-13-0347-0_10 · DOI
  162. 10.1002/mbo3.559 · DOI
  163. 10.1038/nbt1201-1111 · DOI
  164. 10.1038/ismej.2016.26 · DOI
  165. 10.1016/j.copbio.2012.01.015 · DOI
  166. 10.1016/B978-0-12-818307-6.00018-4 · DOI
  167. 10.1111/1462-2920.14378 · DOI
  168. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01778 · DOI · Paper page
  169. 10.1038/s41589-018-0091-7 · DOI · Paper page
  170. 10.1016/B978-0-12-815870-8.00001-2 · DOI
  171. 10.1021/jf9038259 · DOI
  172. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02025 · DOI
  173. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.02045 · DOI
  174. 10.1128/MMBR.00029-09 · DOI
  175. Huang Y, Zhang W, Pang S, et al. Insights into the microbial degradation and catalytic mechanisms of chlorpyrifos. Environ Res. 2021;194:110660 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Bhatt, P., Bhatt, K., Sharma, A., Zhang, W., Mishra, S., & Chen, S.
Affiliations
  • South China Agricultural University (CN)
  • Gurukul Kangri Vishwavidyalaya (IN)
  • Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology (IN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Shaohua
Venue
Critical Reviews in Biotechnology
Published
2021-03-17
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
317-338
ISSN
  • 0738-8551 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-7801
OpenAlex
W3138963009
Cited by
248
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 38
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Reviews in Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (2018B020206001)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2020M672655)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (31401763)
  • Guangdong Special Branch Plan for Young Talent with Scientific and Technological Innovation (2017TQ04N026)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
Keywords
microbial consortia, pesticide degradation, bioremediation, quorum sensing, signal transduction, mixed culture, synthetic microbial consortia, microbial interactions, contaminated sites
MeSH terms
Biodegradation, Environmental, Biotechnology, Pesticides, Synthetic Biology, Microbial Consortia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review