The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
iDrug-Target: predicting the interactions between drug compounds and target proteins in cellular networking via benchmark dataset optimization approach
Open accessAbstract
Information about the interactions of drug compounds with proteins in cellular networking is very important for drug development. Unfortunately, all the existing predictors for identifying drug-protein interactions were trained by a skewed benchmark data-set where the number of non-interactive drug-protein pairs is overwhelmingly larger than that of the interactive ones. Using this kind of highly unbalanced benchmark data-set to train predictors would lead to the outcome that many interactive drug-protein pairs might be mispredicted as non-interactive. Since the minority interactive pairs often contain the most important information for drug design, it is necessary to minimize this kind of misprediction. In this study, we adopted the neighborhood cleaning rule and synthetic minority over-sampling technique to treat the skewed benchmark datasets and balance the positive and negative subsets. The new benchmark datasets thus obtained are called the optimized benchmark datasets, based on which a new predictor called iDrug-Target was developed that contains four sub-predictors: iDrug-GPCR, iDrug-Chl, iDrug-Ezy, and iDrug-NR, specialized for identifying the interactions of drug compounds with GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors), ion channels, enzymes, and NR (nuclear receptors), respectively. Rigorous cross-validations on a set of experiment-confirmed datasets have indicated that these new predictors remarkably outperformed the existing ones for the same purpose. To maximize users' convenience, a public accessible Web server for iDrug-Target has been established at http://www.jci-bioinfo.cn/iDrug-Target/ , by which users can easily get their desired results. It has not escaped our notice that the aforementioned strategy can be widely used in many other areas as well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SMOTE synthetic minority over-sampling technique
Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.953 · Cited by 32,865
Some remarks on protein attribute prediction and pseudo amino acid composition
Chou, K.-C. (2011) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.12.024 · Cited by 1,225
Self-citationSimilarity-based virtual screening using 2D fingerprints
Willett, P. (2006) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2006.10.005 · Cited by 849
Lin, H., Deng, E.-Z., Ding, H., Chen, W., & Chou, K.-C. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku1019 · Cited by 508
Self-citationChou, K.-C., & Cai, Y.-D. (2002) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m204161200 · Cited by 483
Self-citationSupport vector machines for predicting membrane protein types by using functional domain composition
Cai, Y.-D., Zhou, G.-P., & Chou, K.-C. (2003) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(03)70050-2 · Cited by 284
Self-citation
Cited by
Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development
Paul, D., Sanap, G., Shenoy, S., Kalyane, D., Kalia, K., & Tekade, R. K. (2021) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2020.10.010 · Cited by 1,695
Natural Products for Drug Discovery in the 21st Century: Innovations for Novel Drug Discovery
Thomford, N. E., Senthebane, D. A., Rowe, A., Munro, D., Seele, P., Maroyi, A., & Dzobo, K. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19061578 · Cited by 1,241
Liu, B., Fang, L., Long, R., Lan, X., & Chou, K.-C. (2016) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv604 · Cited by 362
Self-citationArtificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Technology Driven Modern Drug Discovery and Development
Sarkar, C., Das, B., Rawat, V. S., Wahlang, J. B., Nongpiur, A., Tiewsoh, I., Lyngdoh, N. M., Das, D., Bidarolli, M., & Sony, H. T. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24032026 · Cited by 347
Liu, B., Yang, F., Huang, D.-S., & Chou, K.-C. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx579 · Cited by 331
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiao, X., Min, J.-L., Lin, W.-Z., Liu, Z., Cheng, X., & Chou, K.-C.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-01-14
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2221-2233
- ISSN
- 0739-1102 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-0254
- OpenAlex
- W2010979687
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 25.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: iDrug-Target: predicting the interactions between drug compounds and target proteins in cellular networking via benchmark dataset optimization approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07391102.2014.998710
- The paper
- Xiao, X., Min, J.-L., Lin, W.-Z., Liu, Z., Cheng, X., & Chou, K.-C. (2015). iDrug-Target: predicting the interactions between drug compounds and target proteins in cellular networking via benchmark dataset optimization approach. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2014.998710
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.