The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 105 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular docking, validation, dynamics simulations, and pharmacokinetic prediction of natural compounds against the SARS-CoV-2 main-protease
Open accessAbstract
The study aims to evaluate the potency of two hundred natural antiviral phytocompounds against the active site of the Severe Acquired Respiratory Syndrome - Coronavirus − 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Main-Protease (Mpro) using AutoDock 4.2.6. The three- dimensional crystal structure of the Mpro (PDB Id: 6LU7) was retrieved from the Protein Data Bank (PDB), the active site was predicted using MetaPocket 2.0. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved viral protease inhibitors were used as standards for comparison of results. The compounds theaflavin-3-3’-digallate, rutin, hypericin, robustaflavone, and (-)-solenolide A with respective binding energy of −12.41 (Ki = 794.96 pM); −11.33 (Ki = 4.98 nM); −11.17 (Ki = 6.54 nM); −10.92 (Ki = 9.85 nM); and −10.82 kcal/mol (Ki = 11.88 nM) were ranked top as Coronavirus Disease − 2019 (COVID-19) Mpro inhibitors. The interacting amino acid residues were visualized using Discovery Studio 3.5 to elucidate the 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional interactions. The study was validated by i) re-docking the N3-peptide inhibitor-Mpro and superimposing them onto co-crystallized complex and ii) docking decoy ligands to Mpro. The ligands that showed low binding energy were further predicted for and pharmacokinetic properties and Lipinski’s rule of 5 and the results are tabulated and discussed. Molecular dynamics simulations were performed for 50 ns for those compounds using the Desmond package, Schrödinger to assess the conformational stability and fluctuations of protein-ligand complexes during the simulation. Thus, the natural compounds could act as a lead for the COVID-19 regimen after in-vitro and in- vivo clinical trials.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility
Morris, G. M., Huey, R., Lindstrom, W., Sanner, M. F., Belew, R. K., Goodsell, D. S., & Olson, A. J. (2009) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21256 · Cited by 25,486
Daina, A., Michielin, O., & Zoete, V. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep42717 · Cited by 18,367
Lead- and drug-like compounds: the rule-of-five revolution
Lipinski, C. A. (2004) · Drug Discovery Today: Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.ddtec.2004.11.007 · Cited by 6,199
Isolation of a Novel Coronavirus from a Man with Pneumonia in Saudi Arabia
Zaki, A. M., van Boheemen, S., Bestebroer, T. M., Osterhaus, A. D. M. E., & Fouchier, R. A. M. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1211721 · Cited by 5,735
LIGPLOT: a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions
Wallace, A. C., Laskowski, R. A., & Thornton, J. M. (1995) · "Protein Engineering, Design and Selection" · doi:10.1093/protein/8.2.127 · Cited by 5,690
The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2
Andersen, K. G., Rambaut, A., Lipkin, W. I., Holmes, E. C., & Garry, R. F. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0820-9 · Cited by 5,081
Jorgensen, W. L., & Tirado-Rives, J. (1988) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00214a001 · Cited by 4,997
A Novel Coronavirus Associated with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
Ksiazek, T. G., Erdman, D., Goldsmith, C. S., Zaki, S. R., Peret, T., Emery, S., Tong, S., Urbani, C., Comer, J. A., Lim, W., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa030781 · Cited by 4,344
Drug-like properties and the causes of poor solubility and poor permeability
Lipinski, C. A. (2000) · Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods · doi:10.1016/s1056-8719(00)00107-6 · Cited by 3,734
Molecular Dynamics Simulation for All
Hollingsworth, S. A., & Dror, R. O. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.011 · Cited by 3,257
Cited by
Benchmarking Refined and Unrefined AlphaFold2 Structures for Hit Discovery
(2023) · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01219 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- C, S., S., D. K., Ragunathan, V., Tiwari, P., A., S., & P, B. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-09-08
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 585-611
- ISSN
- 0739-1102 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-0254
- OpenAlex
- W3083358089
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 105
- FWCI
- 19.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular docking, validation, dynamics simulations, and pharmacokinetic prediction of natural compounds against the SARS-CoV-2 main-protease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07391102.2020.1815584
- The paper
- C, S., S., D. K., Ragunathan, V., Tiwari, P., A., S., & P, B. D. (2022). Molecular docking, validation, dynamics simulations, and pharmacokinetic prediction of natural compounds against the SARS-CoV-2 main-protease. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2020.1815584
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.