Cited by 10Criminal Justice and PenologyLegal and Policy Analysis in IndonesiaWar, Law, and Justice

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Whose Harm? The Role of the State in Restorative Justice

baliga, sujatha·2021·New Political Science

Abstract

The Caucus for New Political Science was honored to host sujatha baliga as our plenary speaker during the 2020 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Although we knew months ...

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07393148.2021.1880700

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Zehr H., 2015, Changing Lenses: Restorative Justice for Our Times

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 10

Metadata

Authors
baliga, S.
Affiliations
Restorative Justice Practitioner, Berkeley, CA
Corresponding author
baliga, sujatha
Venue
New Political Science
Published
2021-03-01
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
35-45
ISSN
  • 0739-3148 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9931
OpenAlex
W3129457359
Cited by
9
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
9.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
New Political Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal and Policy Analysis in Indonesia
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › War, Law, and Justice
Keywords
restorative justice, role of the state, harm, victim-offender mediation, criminal justice reform

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review