The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MEN, MEAT, AND MARRIAGE: MODELS OF MASCULINITY
Abstract
Gender permeates all aspects of life, including foodlife, and can be examined using singular and multiple models of genderedness. Singular models of masculinity gender-type foods as masculine and feminine, suggesting that men and women “do gender" by consuming gender appropriate foods. Meat, especially red meat, is an archetypical masculine food. Men often emphasize meat, and women often minimize meat, in displaying gender as individuals. Dealing with gender in joint marital food choices requires negotiations about sharing masculine and feminine foods as partner foods in joint meals. Contemporary Western “proper meals” center around meat, creating masculine marital meals that reproduce wider patterns of male dominance. Meat is often a contested food in marriage, with food negotiations conflicting about whether, what types, when, and how much meat is consumed. Multiple models of masculinities suggest that marital meat consumption does not necessarily follow formulaic, hegemonic gender patterns. These plural masculinities offer various adjectival gender scripts that can be selectively invoked in negotiating meals shared between partners. Multiple cultural scripts for strong men, healthy men, wealthy men, sensitive men, and other conceptions of masculinities are employed in marital negotiations about “doing meat.” “Doing marriage” involves negotiating and managing masculinities and femininities in food choices that reflect, reproduce, and oppose a variety of gendered societal food scripts. Both singular and multiple models of masculinity offer insights about meat and marriage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
WEST, C., & ZIMMERMAN, D. H. (1987) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002 · Cited by 8,954
The measurement of psychological androgyny
Bem, S. L. (1974) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0036215 · Cited by 8,522
Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men's well-being: a theory of gender and health
Courtenay, W. H. (2000) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00390-1 · Cited by 4,091
Davey, G. K., Spencer, E. A., Appleby, P. N., Allen, N. E., Knox, K. H., & Key, T. J. (2003) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1079/phn2002430 · Cited by 583
People's Accounts Count: The Sociology of Accounts
Orbuch, T. L. (1997) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.455 · Cited by 504 · cited 2×
“When men do not eat in a manly way, they often feel pressure to present gender “accounts” (Orbuch 1997; Scott and Lyman 1963), both to justify their failure to enact appropriately gendered eating and to resist being de-masculinized.”
Background
Cited by
Eating green. Consumers’ willingness to adopt ecological food consumption behaviors
Tobler, C., Visschers, V. H. M., & Siegrist, M. (2011) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.08.010 · Cited by 656
Efforts to overcome vegetarian-induced dissonance among meat eaters
Rothgerber, H. (2014) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2014.04.003 · Cited by 207
Saba, A., Sinesio, F., Moneta, E., Dinnella, C., Laureati, M., Torri, L., Peparaio, M., Saggia Civitelli, E., Endrizzi, I., Gasperi, F., et al. (2019) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.11.017 · Cited by 112
Are men more intuitive when it comes to eating and physical activity?
Gast, J., Madanat, H., & Nielson, A. C. (2012) · American Journal of Men's Health · doi:10.1177/1557988311428090 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Sobal, J.
- Venue
- Food and Foodways
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-03-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 135-158
- ISSN
- 0740-9710 (ISSN-L)
- 1542-3484
- OpenAlex
- W2023378626
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 5.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.