Cited by 168Policing Practices and PerceptionsCriminal Law and EvidenceDeception detection and forensic psychology

Body-Worn Cameras and Citizen Interactions with Police Officers: Estimating Plausible Effects Given Varying Compliance Levels

Hedberg, E. C., Katz, Charles M., Choate, David E.·2017·Justice Quarterly

Abstract

Recent citizen deaths involving police use of force have increased discussion surrounding police accountability and community relations. One piece of this discussion is the use of body worn cameras (BWCs) by officers. Unfortunately, little rigorous research has been conducted to estimate the effectiveness of BWCs in reducing problematic police-citizen interactions. In this paper, we estimate two measures of effectiveness of BWCs by comparing incidents that occur in a squad assigned cameras to incidents that occur in a squad assigned control. First, we estimate the effect of being assigned a BWC (but not necessarily using the camera) on reducing complaints and resistance associated with incidents. Second, we employ data on BWC use to estimate the effect of cameras if they were used with full compliance. Together, these two estimates provide a plausible range of effectiveness that policymakers can expect from BWCs. We find that BWCs have no effect on the rate of arrest or resistance, but can substantially reduce complaints.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07418825.2016.1198825

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hedberg, E. C., Katz, C. M., & Choate, D. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Katz, Charles M.
Venue
Justice Quarterly
Published
2016-07-11
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
627-651
ISSN
  • 0741-8825 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-9109
OpenAlex
W2471201607
Cited by
168
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3
FWCI
89.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Justice Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bureau of Justice Assistance (2011-DB-BX-0018)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Law and Evidence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
Keywords
body-worn cameras, police accountability, police-citizen interaction, police use of force, citizen complaints, police-community relations, arrest rates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review