Cited by 38Sleep and related disordersContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsCircadian rhythm and melatonin

Performance comparison of different interpretative algorithms utilized to derive sleep parameters from wrist actigraphy data

Haghayegh, Shahab, Khoshnevis, Sepideh, Smolensky, Michael H., Diller, Kenneth R., Castriotta, Richard J.·2019·Chronobiology International

Abstract

We compared performance of four popular interpretative algorithms (IAs), i.e., Cole-Kripke, Rescored Cole-Kripke, Sadeh, and UCSD, utilized to derive sleep parameters from wrist actigraphy data. We conducted in-home sleep study of 40 healthy adults (17 female/23 male; age 26.7 ± 12.1 years), assessing sleep variables both by Motionlogger® Micro Watch Actigraphy (MMWA) and Zmachine® Insight+ electroencephalography (EEG). Data of MMWA were separately scored per 30 sec epochs by each of the four popular IAs, and data of the Zmachine were also scored per 30 sec epochs by its proprietary IA. In reference to the EEG Zmachine method, all four of the MMWA algorithms showed high (~94 to 98%) sensitivity and moderate (~42 to 54%) specificity in detecting Sleep epochs. All of them significantly underestimated Sleep Onset Latency (SOL: ~9 to 20 min), and all of them, except the Sadeh IA, significantly underestimated Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO: ~22 to 25 min) and overestimated Total Sleep Time (TST: ~32 to 45 min) and Sleep Efficiency (SE: ~7 to 9%). The Sadeh IA showed significantly smaller bias than the other three IAs in deriving WASO, TST, and SE. Overall, application of 'Rescoring Rules' improved performance of the Cole-Kripke IA. The Sadeh and Rescored Cole-Kripke IAs exhibited highest agreement with the EEG Zmachine method (Cohen's Kappa: ~51%), while the UCSD IA exhibited lowest agreement (Cohen's kappa: ~47%). However, minimum detectable change across all sleep parameters was smallest with use of the UCSD IA and, except for SOL, largest with use of the Sadeh algorithm. Findings of this study indicate the Sadeh IA is most appropriate for deriving sleep parameters of healthy adults, while the UCSD IA is most appropriate for evaluating change in sleep parameters over time or in response to medical intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07420528.2019.1679826

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An in-home sleep study of 40 healthy people measuring sleep characteristics using Motionlogger® Micro Watch Actigraphy using Cole-Kripke algorithm revealed 94% to 98% sensitivity and 42% to 54% specificity in identifying Sleep epochs.

    “An in-home sleep study of 40 healthy people measuring sleep characteristics using Motionlogger® Micro Watch Actigraphy (MMWA) using Cole–Kripke algorithm, revealed 94% to 98% sensitivity and 42% to 54% specificity in identifying Sleep epochs [196].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haghayegh, S., Khoshnevis, S., Smolensky, M. H., Diller, K. R., & Castriotta, R. J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Haghayegh, Shahab
Venue
Chronobiology International
Published
2019-10-28
Volume
36
Issue
12
Pages
1752-1760
ISSN
  • 0742-0528 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-6073
OpenAlex
W2982385880
Cited by
38
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3
FWCI
5.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chronobiology International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Keywords
wrist actigraphy, sleep stage classification, sleep latency, wake after sleep onset, total sleep time, sleep efficiency, minimal detectable change
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Algorithms, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Humans, Male, Sleep, Young Adult, Actigraphy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review