The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Information Technology Payoff in the Health-Care Industry: A Longitudinal Study
Abstract
:With the enormous investments in Information Technology (IT), the question of payoffs from IT has become increasingly important. Organizations continue to question the benefits from IT investments especially in conjunction with corporate initiatives such as business process reengineering (BPR). Furthermore, the impact of technology on nonfinancial outcomes such as customer satisfaction and quality is gaining interest.However, studies examining the IT—performance relationship have been far from conclusive. The difficulty in identifying impacts from technology has been the isolation of benefits of IT from other factors that may also contribute to organizational performance. Furthermore, benefits from technology investments may be realized over an extended period of time. Finally, IT benefits may accrue when they are done in concert with other organizational initiatives such as business process reengineering. This calls for studies that take into account control variables as well as data that span time periods.In this study, we examine monthly data collected from eight hospitals over a recent three-year time period. We specify propositions that relate investments in IT to performance, and the combined effect of technology and BPR on performance. We draw upon the literature in health-care management to incorporate appropriate control variables in the analyses. Our results provide support for the IT—performance relationship that is observed after certain time lags. Such a relationship may not be evident in cross-sectional or snapshot data analyses. Also, results indicate support for the impact of technology contingent on BPR practiced by hospitals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The productivity paradox of information technology
Brynjolfsson, E. (1993) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/163298.163309 · Cited by 2,604
Cited by
RAVICHANDRAN, T., LERTWONGSATIEN, C., & LERTWONGSATIEN, C. (2005) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2005.11045820 · Cited by 1,238
Why Do Customer Relationship Management Applications Affect Customer Satisfaction?
Mithas, S., Krishnan, M. S., & Fornell, C. (2005) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.201 · Cited by 776
ZHU, K., KRAEMER, K. L., & DEDRICK, J. (2004) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2004.11045797 · Cited by 775
In Pursuit of Moderation: Nine Common Errors and Their Solutions1
Carte, T. A., & Russell, C. J. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036541 · Cited by 565
Schryen, G. (2013) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2012.45 · Cited by 420
Metadata
- Authors
- Devaraj, S., & Kohli, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 41-67
- ISSN
- 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-928X
- OpenAlex
- W2150983842
- Cited by
- 580
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Information Technology Payoff in the Health-Care Industry: A Longitudinal Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07421222.2000.11518265
- The paper
- Devaraj, S., & Kohli, R. (2000). Information Technology Payoff in the Health-Care Industry: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Management Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2000.11518265
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.